Textbook Notes (369,074)
Canada (162,369)
Sociology (1,062)
SOCB05H3 (26)

SOCB05 - Ch1 Notes

3 Pages

Course Code
Ann Mullen

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
A.HUANG SOCB05: LOGIC OF SOCIAL INQUIRY NOTES WEEK 1 Chapter 1: Human Inquiry and Science INTRODUCTION - Most of what you know is a matter of agreement and belief. Little is based on personal experience and discovery. The basis of knowledge is agreement Looking for Reality - Science offers an approach to both agreement reality and experiential reality. - In general, a scientific assertion must have both logical and empirical support: It must make sense and not contradict actual observation. - Epistemology is the science of knowing; methodology (a subfield of epistemology) might be called the science of finding out. LOOKING FOR REALITY Ordinary Human Inquiry - Humans seem predisposed to predict their future circumstances using causal and probabilistic reasoning. We generally recognize that future circumstances are caused or conditioned by present ones and that such patterns of cause and effect are probabilistic in nature. In that, the effects occur more often when the causes occur than when they don‘t—but not always. Ex: Studying and good marks - Once we can understand why things are related to one another and why certain patterns occur, we can predict better than through simply observing and figuring out. - Agreement reality both assists and hinders our attempts to find out for ourselves; consider two important sources of our secondhand knowledge—tradition and authority Tradition - Each of us inherits a culture made up, in part, of firmly accepted knowledge about the world - Advantage of tradition and by accepting everybody knows, we are spared from searching from scratch - At the same time, tradition may hinder human inquiry. Normally, many don‘t seek a fresh understanding of something everybody already agrees upon, or they may be looked at as foolish. Authority - Often, acceptance of new knowledge will depend on the status of the discoverer. - Authority can both assist and hinder human inquiry: We trust the judgment of the person who has special training, expertise, and credentials for a given matter but we are also hindered by that same reason if they were to err in their field - Inquiry is also hindered when we depend on authority of experts speaking outside of their relam Errors in Inquiry and Some Solutions - Lets look at some common errors we make in our casual inquiries and how science can guard against that - Inaccurate Observations oWe frequently make mistakes in our observations. Most of our daily observations are casual and semi-conscious, that‘s why we often disagree about what really happened. A.HUANG SOCB05: LOGIC OF SOCIAL INQUIRY NOTES oIn contrast, scientific observation is a conscious activity. oIn many cases, simple and complex measurement devices help guard against inaccurate observations. Ex. Taking colour photos of instructor‘s attire. - Overgeneralization oWhen we look for patterns in what we observe, we often assume that a few similar events are evidence of a general pattern – We over-generalize on the basis of limited observations. oScientists guard against this by committing themselves in advance to a sufficiently large and representative sample of observations oThe repl
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.