Health Sciences 2610F/G Chapter Notes - Chapter 7: Intergenerational Equity, Life Extension, Daniel Callahan

• School: Western University
• Department: Health Sciences
• Course: Health Sciences 2610F/G
• Professor: Ken Kirkwood

Document Summary

(cid:449)he(cid:374) a(cid:272)(cid:272)ess is (cid:374)e(cid:272)essar(cid:455) to (cid:373)eet people"s (cid:272)lai(cid:373)s of (cid:374)eeds a(cid:374)d. 2: currently, more people could benefit from preventative measures like prenatal care, better hygiene, cleaner environment, diet and lifestyle. But if the greater benefit to a healthy one prevents a chronic condition that would be worse than current sick person, greater benefit is given to the healthy person (therefore, priority to worse off is not absolute) If benefits to the sick are small and benefits to healthy are significantly greater, this is justified. Quantity and quality of additional life-years resulting from treatment will be better for the young than old. Doing the above does not mean excluding services for elderly and disabled can be argued that these two groups are worse off than uninsured (who are mostly young adults and children; arguable that elderly fair worse than uninsured children)