Textbook Notes (369,067)
Canada (162,366)
Philosophy (290)

Just War, Walzer

3 Pages

Course Code
Philosophy 2083F/G
Frank Cameron

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
TERRORISM AND JUST WAR – WALZER INTRO  Just war theory helps us understand the wrongfulness of terrorism  First, consider the choice of terror as a political strategy, and then worry about some of the problems of combating it  Terrorism is the random killing of innocent people, in the hope of creating pervasive fear – fear can serve many different political purposes  Randomness and innocence are the crucial elements in the definition  Innocence functions in the theory as a term of art; it describes the group of non- combatants, civilians, men and women who are not materially engaged in the war effort  The opposite of innocent is not guilty but engaged. Disengaged civilians are innocent without regard to their personal morality or politics  A lot of soldiers are not actual combatants; they serve behind the lines  Meaning of membership in an army and in civilian society – the army is an organized and all its members contribute to the achievement of its ends  They have been mobilized for a singular purpose, and what they do advances that purpose – they are isolated from the general public  Civilians have many different purposes they have been trained in many different pursuits and professions  But they are a collective of another kind – they identify themselves as they commonly share a language and a history and in some prosaic sense of the term, a destiny  Jus in bello, that civilians can’t be targeted or deliberately killed – this is the deepest meaning of non-combatant immunity  Only individuals charged with specific war crimes can be brought to trial and possibly, executed. All the others retain their individual and group immunities  Terrorists attack both these immunities  They signal a political intention to destroy or remove or radically subordinate these people individual and this people collectively  State terror is also most often focused on a collective that is thought to be oppositional or potentially so-sometimes an ethnic group, sometimes a socio-economic class  Tyranny and terror are always closely connected  Sometimes, perhaps, terrorists do have limited purposes  In all those cases where violence is random, directed against innocent men and women its victims have good reason to be skeptical about claims that the terrorists have a limited agenda, random murder implies universal vulnerability  If we name terrorists by their actions rather than their supposed goals we are then free to support the goals  A decent politics often requires a two front campaign – against oppression and occupation  I don’t believe that terrorism can ever be justified – in rare and narrowly circumscribed
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.