CRM/LAW C144 Chapter Notes - Chapter MONTOYA, BRADY, and MURO: Appellate Court, Methamphetamine, Mens Rea

• School: UC-Irvine
• Department: Criminology, Law and Society
• Course: CRM/LAW C144
• Professor: Meeker

Document Summary

Underlying facts, the actual crime that took place: a private bodyguard shot and severely wounded lowery, mo(cid:374)toya, o(cid:374)e of the shoote(cid:396)"s asso(cid:272)iates, the(cid:374) d(cid:396)o(cid:448)e the (cid:448)i(cid:272)ti(cid:373) to a se(cid:272)luded lo(cid:272)atio(cid:374) and left him there to die. Decision below: montoya was convicted of murder on the theory that he had caused the death by preventing lowery from getting help. Appellate decision confirm or reverse conviction: appellate court reversed the conviction. Reason given for decision: the e(cid:448)ide(cid:374)(cid:272)e (cid:449)as (cid:272)lea(cid:396)ly i(cid:374)suffi(cid:272)ie(cid:374)t to suppo(cid:396)t a (cid:272)o(cid:374)(cid:272)lusio(cid:374) of (cid:862)(cid:271)ut-fo(cid:396)(cid:863) Personal reaction: (cid:862)but (cid:449)ould it (cid:373)ake sense for montoya who wanted lowery to die to escape a murder conviction simply by showing that his victim might ha(cid:448)e died a(cid:374)y(cid:449)ay? (cid:863) Decision below: defendant was convicted of causing both deaths. Reason given for decision: ne(cid:271)(cid:396)aska up(cid:396)e(cid:373)e cou(cid:396)t held that (cid:271)e(cid:272)ause the state had p(cid:396)o(cid:448)ed (cid:862)o(cid:374)ly the possibility of su(cid:396)(cid:448)i(cid:448)al (cid:449)ith ea(cid:396)lie(cid:396) t(cid:396)eat(cid:373)e(cid:374)t,(cid:863) it had failed to p(cid:396)o(cid:448)e (cid:271)ut-for causation beyond a reasonable doubt.