HIST 202 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Perfectly Clear, Smallpox, Matriarchy

• School: McGill University
• Department: History
• Course: HIST 202
• Professor: Elsbeth Anne Heaman

Document Summary

It"s (cid:374)ot (cid:271)ias just to sa(cid:455) that so(cid:373)ethi(cid:374)g has a(cid:374) outlook. Whe(cid:374) (cid:449)e sa(cid:455) (cid:271)ias it"s a(cid:374) i(cid:373)po(cid:396)ta(cid:374)t (cid:449)o(cid:396)d (cid:271)e(cid:272)ause it"s a(cid:374) a(cid:272)(cid:272)usatio(cid:374) of (cid:449)(cid:396)o(cid:374)gi(cid:374)g. You need evidence to make a bias claim. If (cid:455)ou do(cid:374)"t ha(cid:448)e a bias, (cid:455)ou (cid:272)a(cid:374)"t a(cid:272)(cid:272)use histo(cid:396)ia(cid:374)s fo(cid:396) (cid:449)(cid:396)o(cid:374)gdoi(cid:374)g but (cid:455)ou (cid:374)eed evidence. Politi(cid:272)all(cid:455) (cid:455)ou (cid:272)a(cid:374)"t easil(cid:455) (cid:373)at(cid:272)h up what we understand of indigenous political organization and migrant concepts. In prior times you could only vote or have a stay in society if you owned property. To stay that there is a state is colonialism at some level. It"s (cid:374)ot wrong: but it is a real problem for political scientists. The logic is effective there is no political science definition of state but a lot of historians see a double standard. How does power work: they want formal maps, constitutions (this is what the europeans are used to, this is what they wanted when they first entered)