PHIL 375 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Jean-Paul Sartre, Intentionality

39 views2 pages

orchidlocust153

2 Jan 2019

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

What is it that consciousness is like by itself before looking at through inter- subjectivities. Another consciousness comes into play which is in the mode of being-for-itself. This other consciousness also belongs in the same world. This world becomes intersubjective and for sartre this is not a harmonious meaning to the world. The consciousness is looking at my consciousness: gives me the affect/feeling of being seen by the other, to feel the subjectivity, i feel like i am being seen by the other. I cannot grasp the other as an object. This gives me a self - ego id: related to consciousness but not consciousness, pre-reflective level self-consciousness. The possibilities i have in the world is to some degree is circumscribed. The world that we live in is not a solitary world nor the order that experience may be. Was he never even living in a world without others.

Related Questions

Brief and detail

If relativism is true, can you ever judge something as being morally wrong? Consider some really horrible actions, genocide, murder, slavery, torture or add your own. If you feel a relativist could say that these things are actually wrong, what gives them this ability? If they can't, why not?

Agree or disagree

Similarly to what I said in the first discussion on what morality means to us, I think everyone has their own set of moral principles and obligations. So I do think that relativism is true, to a point however. I used Adolf Hitler and the Nazi empire as an example in the first discussion so I will use that here. Hitler knew in his brain that what he was doing was good for his nation and arguably the world. Now, as a modern day society we can agree that was wrong. For him, it was good. In his own mind, he is right. But it is relative to the person. Generally speaking we all have similar notions of what is right and what is wrong. Most people would say that going out of your way to help someone else is a morally good principle. Selflessness in society is seen a good thing by the vast majority of people. When I say that relativism is good to a point, I mean that there is a general basis in society that deems actions as good or bad. And since most of us would all agree that hitlers actions were bad, then we say that he had bad moral principles, even though to him, they were good. It’s a little confusing even for me to put into words. Basically, if you actions are generally viewed in society as good, then you have good moral principles even if they vary from person to person. No one will have the exact same moral standards, but generally they all are very similar in society. So relativism is true until the point where the majority of society would deem your actions and wrong. I hope this makes sense.

Agree or disagree

If relativism is true, I don't think judging something as morally wrong is possible. Because the definition of ethical relativism is the moral standard only being correctly relative to each person/society, this means that the moral standard is created by you and/or the society you identify with and therefore eliminate the existence of an absolute moral principle. Since the moral standard is different for every individual, we cannot say that someone is morally wrong. If relativism is applied, that is. If a relativist were to say that they could judge someone as morally wrong, then that would contradict the main component of being a relativist. That every moral argument of yours is correct, therefore everyone else's is also correct. Quite problematic but that is my understanding on the matter

ell25

I am so lost onwere to even begin. I just need help trying to find the Ñ² (angle)for part part 1 of the experiment if anyone can just explain how todo that and maybe give me a step-by-step example so I can finishthe rest. Thank you! Experiment 6 ~ Friction

Purpose:

In this lab, you will make some basic measurements of friction.You will measure the coefficients of staticfriction between several combinations of surfaces using aninclined plane, and you will measure the coefficient ofkinetic friction between two of the combinationsof surfaces you used in the static friction part of thisexperiment.

Part 1: StaticFriction

Theory:

The coefficient of static frictionm_s can be measured experimentally foran object placed on an inclined plane (a.k.a. ramp, a.k.a. hill).The coefficient of static friction is related to the criticalangle q_c for the ramp, at whichthe object just begins to slide. Using what we havecovered in class, you can derive this relationshipyourself! At this critical angle, static friction preventing theobject from sliding down the hill is just exactly equal to thecomponent of the objectâs weight along the hill. If the componentof the weight along the hill were just a little greater, it wouldovercome friction, and the object would start to slide down. Thefree body diagram for this situation will look like the figuresketched below. Use this diagram to find an equation that relatesm_s toq_c.

F_N = NormalForce = mg cos(Î¸)

F_F =Î¼_s x F_N = Î¼_s mg cos(Î¸)

Î£F_x = mA_x = F_Gx - F_F = ?

F_Gx = mgsin(Î¸)

Hint #1: the angle q of the incline is the same as theangle between the normal force N and the weightmg. Why?

Hint #2: The weight mg can be broken into twocomponents. One component is along the incline(W_H). The other component is âpressinginto the hillâ, and is equal in magnitude to the normal forceN. (This is an example of a situation where the normalforce is not equal to the weight!) Remember that you need to usethe normal force to calculate friction, sincef=mN. Now calculate what the angle ofthe incline should be, so that the component of the weight down thehill is just exactly balanced by friction.

Equipment:

For this lab you will need to share the following ramps andblocks with other lab groups:

Ramps Blocks

Aluminum Aluminum

ParticleBoard Brass

StainlessSteel Plexiglass

Plastic Copper

Rubber

Steel

Wood

Experiment:

Test at least 5 different combinations of materials. Record thematerial of the block and the ramp for each combination.

1. Measure and record the length of theinclined plane you will be using. (This is thehypotenuse of the right triangle!)

2. Place the block on the plane and begin tiltingthe plane just until the point when the block begins to slide.

3. Measure the height of the raisedend of the inclined plane at this point. (This is theopposite side of the right triangle!) You cancalculate the angle from the measurements of the two sides.

4. Repeat the height measurement at least 3 timesfor each combination of materials. Record all the measurements inthe table below. Then,

(a) calculate the angle from the measurements of the hypotenuseand opposite side you just obtained

(b) use the equation you derived above in order to calculate thecoefficient of kinetic friction from the angle.

Block: woodenblock Block: cooper

Ramp:particleboard Ramp: particle board

Length of ramp:0.61(m) Length of ramp: 0.61(m)

Height(m)	Ñ²	Ms	Height(m)	Ñ²	Ms
0.24			0.26
0.25			0.31
0.245			0.345

avg m_s: ______ s : _______ avg m_s: ______ s : _______

Block:aluminum Block:particle board block

Ramp: solidewood Ramp: solide wood

Length of ramp:0.605(m) Length of ramp: 0.605(m)

Height(m)	Ñ²	s	Height(m)	Ñ²	s
0.15			0.23
0.16			0.165
0.16			0.195

avg m_s: ______ s : _______ avg m_s: ______ s : _______

5. Remember that in class we said that friction does not dependon surface area. You can easily test whether or not this iscorrect. Choose a block/ramp combination not already tested, andmake sure the block is not a cube or cylinder. Place the block sothat the side with the larger surface area is in contact with theboard. Now measure the angle at which the block just begins toslide (by measuring the hypotenuse and opposite sides of thecorresponding right triangle). As before, calculate the coefficientof friction from the angle you measured, using your equation.Repeat this process with the side of the block with the smallersurface area in contact with the board. Enter this data in thesmall tables below.

Block (larger end) :_________ Block (smaller end):__________

Ramp:_______________ Ramp: ________________

Length of ramp:______(m) Length of ramp: ______(m)

Height(m)	s	Height(m)	s

avg m_s: ______ s : _______ avg m_s: ______ s : _______

Part 2: KineticFriction

Theory:

You can calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction,m_k, using a variation of the methodyou used for the coefficient of static friction. For thecoefficient of kinetic friction, you can use the same free bodydiagram as the one drawn on the first page. But now, thecombination of W_H and the force offriction will need to add up such that the block will slide at aconstant speed. Think of Newtonâs first and second laws when youset up this equation. Derive a relationship between the criticalangle and the coefficient of kinetic friction.

Experiment:

You can measure m_k using aprocedure similar to the one you used to measurem_s. This time, just pick twocombinations of materials. The combinations you pick for this partof the experiment have to be combinations you alreadyused for the static friction part of the experiment, because thepoint is to compare m_sandm_k!

1. Measure and record the length ofthe inclined plane you will be using.

2. Raise the plane high enough for the blockto begin moving. Begin lowering the plane just until the pointwhen the block begins to slow down. (Alternatively, raise theboard while tapping the block until block moves at a constantrate.)

3. Measure the height of the raisedend of the inclined plane at this point.

4. Repeat the height measurement at least 3times for each combination of materials. Record all themeasurements in the table below. Then,

(a) calculate the angle from the measurements of the hypotenuseand opposite side you just obtained

(b) use the equation you derived above in order to calculate thecoefficient of kinetic friction from the angle.

Block (from part 1) :_________ Block (from part 1):__________

Ramp:_______________ Ramp: ________________

Length of ramp:______(m) Length of ramp: ______(m)

Height(m)	k	Height(m)	k

avg m_k: ______ s : _______ avg m_k: ______ s : _______

Analysis:

Calculate the mean value and standard deviation of thecoefficient of static friction that you measured, for each set ofmaterials.

ramp/board pair		Standard deviation




(larger end)
(smaller end)

Calculate the mean value and standard deviation of thecoefficient of kinetic friction that you measured, for each set ofmaterials.

ramp/board

pair

Standard

deviation

Questions:

1. How do the values of m_s compareto the values of m_k? (Of course, youcan only compare them for the same pairs of materials.)

2. Is the relationship betweenm_sand m_kwhat you expected?

3. Of the two parts of the experiment, measurement ofm_sand measurement ofm_k, which had more sources of error?What were some of the sources of error?

4. Could m_k orm_s ever be greater than 1? Explain whyor why not.

5. Is the coefficient of friction the same as when the block wasstanding on its larger (or smaller) end?

6. Think about your results. Do they make sense when youconsider your everyday experiences?

PHIL 375 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Jean-Paul Sartre, Intentionality

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

PHIL 375 Lecture Notes - Jean-Paul Sartre, Psychoanalysis, Social Fact

PHIL 375 Lecture Notes - Lecture 8: Intentionality

PHIL 375 Lecture 10: lecture 10

Related Questions