PROC 124 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Soft Law, Le Droit, Uashat
24 Jan 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
The idea that they need to be justified w/i the framework of the charter is illustrated in sierra and cbc: whenever a judge thinks about the limit being charter-compliant, one of the key. We highlighted the public interest nature of the open court principle. The co. should never be able to obtain some kind of sealing order just on the basis that i may lose business or my business reputation may be damaged (par. 55): if you"re coca cola, that"s different. Uber canada (2015, oncs: toronto took them to court on alleging that uber was operating an illegal taxi business, response: we"re merely a technological co. Uber was making the argument that this is a unique insurance policy: court: reiterated that trade secrets properly understood in appropriate circumstances need to be protected; tf can lead to a limit to the open court principle.
