Class Notes (835,068)
Canada (508,910)
Sociology (2,104)
SOCIOL 2S06 (332)
David Young (323)
Lecture 16

2S06 Lecture 16.docx
Premium

5 Pages
36 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOCIOL 2S06
Professor
David Young
Semester
Winter

Description
Fox 1 Lecture 16 SOCIOL 2S06 Monday November 11, 2014  A Structural Functionalist Theory of Stratification cont.: 2. Consensus on the Ranking of Positions - There is a consensus on occupational positions - According to Davis and Moore, this ranking is based upon 2 particular criteria o Ranking occupational positions based on: the `functional importance` of the occupation to society o The `differential scarcity` of people with the training and talent to fill that occupation  Some jobs require more training and skills than other jobs which is factored into the ranking - i.e. Medical Doctor o ranked highly o important for the functioning of society o few people have the necessary education and skill - i.e. Truck Driver o ranked much lower because most would see it as less functionally important o less functionally important for society o many people have the necessary skills 1. unequal rewards based on the ranking - differences in money and prestige - they argue that this is necessary to motivate people to fill those occupations that are most functionally important and that require the most training and talent - we have to offer more money to motivate those to take on those highly ranked job - i.e. medical doctors need to be given more money and recorded higher prestige than truck drivers because their job is more functional within society - this is an important aspect of their argument but they also argue that people get slotted into their occupations based on their efforts and ability o if people work hard and are really bright, they can be medical doctors o on the other hand, if they don’t want to work that hard or put in effort and if they are not that bright they can be truck drivers  this is how they are slotted into the occupational hierarchy 2. Consensus on the Perceived Justice of Unequal Rewards - Members of society generally agree that it is acceptable to have a hierarchy in which some occupations are given a lot more rewards than others - This is backed up in some ideas in certain countries o i.e. in Canada and U.S. there is a lot of value of meritocracy- you will find a place in society based on merit  focus on individual achievement  we suggest that there is equal opportunity- everyone has the same shot at a job but it is whether they take it and can do it or not A. Some Criticisms of the Theory 1. The inequality of women and minorities - As we have seen, the theory suggests that effort and ability determines a person’s place in the stratification system - If that is the case, that raises a number of questions o If you take courses on sociology of gender, you know that there is a lot of evidence that women and minorities are unfortunately slotted into a lower end of the occupation hierarchy o Why is that? o The answer with this theory is that they lack ability and effort- they haven’t tried and don’t have a lot of skill but clearly this is not the case, what is going on is structured inequality- they are disadvantaged within society 2. The functional importance of certain jobs - This theory cannot explain why certain jobs are highly rewarded than others
More Less

Related notes for SOCIOL 2S06

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit