Class Notes (836,201)
Canada (509,690)
LAW 122 (825)
Lecture 4

Lecture 4.docx

7 Pages
87 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Law and Business
Course
LAW 122
Professor
Leigh Lampert
Semester
Fall

Description
Chapter 4 9/24/2013 7:06:00 AM Midterm 10 multiple choice ¾ True false with explanation Invasion of Privacy -Striking a difficult balance  Privacy increasingly under threat of invasion  Camera-equipped cellular telephones  Internet predators and vulnerable children -Need to protect countervailing interests  freedom of expression  collection of personal information and data -No separate tort called invasion of privacy -Reasons:  courts want to support freedom of expression  courts are concerned about defining concept of privacy in a way that strikes a fair balance between the parties.  Difficult to define scope of protected interests  Losses often merely intangible (embarrassment) -Possible emergence of judge-made tort  courts increasingly imposing liability for invasion o surveillance camera to monitor a neighbor’s backyard o unauthorized use of photography o unauthorized disclosure of HIV- positive status -Section 162 of the Criminal Code  Crime of voyeurism: secretly observing or recording a person “in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy”  E.g if the person is engaged in sexual activity or is nude -Statutory torts  enacted in some provinces only  liability for willful violation of privacy -In Canada, the ability to sue in tort law for an invasion of privacy varies from on jurisdiction to another. -Ontario- 2012 Court of Appeal decision in the Jones v. Tsige case: tort of intrusion upon seclusion now exists in Ontario. -exemplary damages awarded to make an example or statement Key features of the tort of inclusion upon seclusion are:  Defendant’s actions =intentional or reckless; -Recognized cause of action for invasion of privacy in the form of the intrusion upon seclusion. -Not enough to establish plaintiff actually experiences deep humiliation or anguish; must establish that a reasonable person would have experienced deep humiliation or anguish. -Not necessary to establish harm to a recognized economic interest -The right to privacy that is protected is not an absolute right.  To be balanced against competing claims, such as freedom of expression and freedom of the press. Chapter 5 9/24/2013 7:06:00 AM Miscellaneous Torts Affecting Business -Recurring tension in business law  aggressive competition vs. fair play  market forces vs. legal intervention -Acts permitted unless specifically prohibited  business torts: the exception- not the rule Conspiracy -the strange magic in numbers  no tort if one party hurts another economically o single party may be powerful multinational  tort if two parties hurt another economically o two parties may be weak individuals -plaintiff must prove  if conspiracy to commit lawful act o defendants’ primary purpose was to hurt plaintiff -if conspiracy to commit unlawful act  defendants should have known risk of harm Intimida
More Less

Related notes for LAW 122

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit