CRIM 220 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Nuremberg Code, Syphilis, Institutional Review Board
1 Sep 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Chapter 3 ethics a(cid:374)d cri(cid:373)i(cid:374)al justice research. Agreeing to participate after being informed about goals, procedures, and potential risks. Weighing potential harm against potential benefits (justified if potential benefits outweigh harm) Anonymity - don"t even know who they are. Confidentiality link info with person but not identified in any report of data. Ethical: conforming to the norms or standards of a group examples of research causing harm. Tuskegee syphilis study (1932) over-arching issues to consider** Vulnerable pop (e. g. , juveniles, mentally ill, learning disability, offenders, victims, offenders" facilities, pop in need) Becoming accessory to crime; or getting drawn into a criminal role. Respect for persons voluntary participation for those with capacity. Beneficence no harm to participants and seek to produce benefits. Justice benefits and burdens of participating should be equally distributed. Canada: tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans (tps) institutional review boards (irbs) Judge acceptability of study risks to human subjects.
