1. He denies the closure of knowledge under (known) deduction
1. P is true
2. S believes that P
3. ~P -> ~(S believes P)
4. P -> S believes P.
- Under Nozick, I can know neither that I am a BIV not that I am not a
- Descartes – this is outrageous!
- How can I track the truth? What’s the justification?
- Descartes is an internalitst about justification. ->
- S is justified in believing p iff S’s own evidence supports the be