Class Notes (836,030)
Canada (509,587)
Psychology (1,556)
PSYC 268 (61)
Lecture 5

WEEK 5 Reading Notes

6 Pages
129 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 268
Professor
Deborah Connolly
Semester
Winter

Description
PSYC 268 – Fall 2012 Week 5 Book Readings: Chapter 2 pp. 45-52; Chapter 10 pp. 274-287 CHAPTER 2: FORENSIC ASSESSMENT IN CRIMINAL DOMAINS RISK ASSESSMENT Approaches to Risk Management 1. Unstructured Clinical Judgment – clinical decision making o Ideographic approach – focuses on the specific individual rather than on groups of individuals o Qualitative approach – relies on subjective (clinician) judgments o The clinician who is conducting a violence risk assessment in this manner will use his or her best clinical judgment regarding the likelihood that the examinee will be violent in the future 2. Actuarial Decision-Making o Nomothetic approach – based on research done on large groups of people o Quantitative approach – statistical data o The clinician who is conducting a violence risk assessment will use a formal, algorithmic, objective approach to make a decision o The clinician must incorporate his or her professional experience by using a formulaic approach that takes into consideration specific risk markers, each given a specific weight o This approach has been found to be considerably more accurate 3. Structured Professional Judgment o Melds the actuarial and clinical approaches o A specific array of risk markers is considered, thus ensuring that all clinicians take into consideration the same risk factors for each examinee o The clinician is able to introduce his or her professional experience to temper or augment the actuarial prediction Violence Risk Factors – past violent behavior; young age; relationship instability; employment instability; substance use; major mental disorder; early home or school maladjustment; violations of conditional release; lack of insight, etc Risk Assessment Instruments - Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG by Quincey, Harris 2005) – used to predict the probability of violence within a particular time frame in offenders with mental disorders; actuarial - Violence Prediction Scheme (VPS by Webster, Harris 1994) ; actuarial - HCR-20 (Webster, Douglas 1997) – information and criteria for evaluating 10 historical factors, 5 clinical factors, and 5 risk management factors and encompasses past, present, and future risk considerations; structured professional judgment - Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA by Kropp, Hart 1998); structured professional judgment - Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20 by Boer, Hart 1997) – information and criteria for evaluating 11 psychosocial adjustment, 7 sexual offense, and 2 future plans variables for the evaluation of violence risk in sex offenders; structured professional judgment - Sex Offender Risk Assessment Guide (SORAG by Quinsey, Harris 2005) – used to predict the probability of violence and sexual recidivism in previously convicted sex offenders - Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offense Recidivism (RRASOR by Hanson 1997) – brief 4-item screening instrument used to evaluate risk for sexual violence in previously convicted sex offenders - STATIC-99/STATIC-2002 (Hanson, Thornton 1999) – used to determine the long-term potential for sexual recidivism in male sex offenders - Sex Offender Needs Assessment Rating (SONAR by Hanson, Harris 2000) – used to measure change in level of risk for sex offenders - Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool (MnSOST-R by Epperson, Kaul 1998) – used to determine level of risk for sexual recidivism among rapists and intrafamilial child molesters Psychopathy and Risk Assessment Psychopathy – personality style that encompasses both behavioral and affective (emotional) component - Characteristics – glib, grandiose, callous, remorseless, reckless, manipulative, impulsive, dishonest, parasitic, and unable to experience the normal range and depth of emotional experience - Individuals with psychopathic personality styles are more likely to engage in general criminal behavior and violent behavior than their nonpsychopathic counterparts Violence Risk Assessment for Psychopaths - Different Factors o The nature of the violence or the types of violence that may occur o The severity or seriousness of the violence o The frequency of the violence or how often it might occur o The imminence or how soon violence might occur o The likelihood or probability that violence will occur - Risk Management – refers to the strategy of attempting to reduce the probability that an individual will be violent by describing conditions under which it may increase and other where it may decrease o To manage one’s risk, one must know the conditions that may serve to increase or decrease the probability of violence so that these can be monitored or adjusted accordingly o i.e. access and use of drugs or alcohol - Assess through risk assessment instruments; interviews with offender, individuals who know the offender PSYCHOPATHY AND MALINGERING Psychopathy – constellation of affective, interpersonal, and behavioral characteristics - Often has significant impact on the individual’s understanding of and functioning within his or her environment - Characteristics: lacking emotional responsiveness, having no sense of shame, being superficially charming and manipulative, showing irresponsible behavior, being inadequately motivated - Distinct from antisocial personality disorder (APD) though they have some similarities o Psychopathy is a broader concept than APD, and encompasses an interpersonal/affective component in addition to the behavioral component of APD - Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R by Hare 1991, 2003) o 20 items that are rated on the basis of file information and an interview with the examinee Malingering – the feigned production or exaggeration of psychological or physical symptoms to achieve some external incentive - Validity of psychological assessment instrument hinges on examinees being honest and forthright in their effort and responses - Formal evaluation of malingering might include the use of a forensic instrument developed specifically for the purposes of detection of malingering o Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS by Rogers, Bagby 1992) o Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST by Miller 1995) o Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM by Tombaugh 1996) o Validity Indicator Profile (VIP by Frederick 1997) - Informal evaluation might involve only a very close scrutiny of the results of various self-reported information and various collateral sources of information without any specific testing - Two things individuals might fake: (1) psychiatric symptoms, (2) cognitive impairment o Malingering psychiatric symptoms – pretending to experience symptoms of a mental disorder o Malingering cognitive impairment – pretending to be experiencing memory or other mental impairment CHAPTER 10: CORRECTIONAL PSYCHOLOGY OFFENDER RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT Offender Risk Assessment – the process of identifying risk and protective factors for crime Offender Risk Management – the process of preventing crime by influencing risk and protective factors Risk – can only be forecast with uncertainty - Inherently dynamic and contextual i.e. depends on where one lives, what kinds of services they receive, motivation to establish pro-social adjustment, whether they experience adverse life events - Not a characteristic of the physical world; cannot be evaluated objectively but rather, is a subjective perception Risk Factor – perceptions regarding the degree or quantum of risk in a given case, are based in turn on judgments regarding the collective influence of myriad individual things or elements - Fixed risk markers – do not change status over time - Variable risk markers – change status over time, but these changes do not influence the outcome - Causal risk factors – change status over time, and these changes influence the outcome Decision Theories – crime is a voluntary, purposeful human behavior - The decision is a cost-benefit analysis - Psychology or Criminal Conduct (PCC) perspective - General Personality and Cognitive Social Learning (GPCSL) perspective - Focuses on the offender’s personality, attitudes, and experiences Assessment – the process of gathering information for use in decision making Offender Risk Assessment – process of evaluating offenders to (1) characterize the risk that they will commit crime
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 268

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit