Class Notes (835,894)
Canada (509,478)
Psychology (7,782)
PSYB10H3 (544)
Lecture

PSYB10 - Lec 4 (near verbatim) - Attitudes & Persuasion; Conformity & Dissent.doc

12 Pages
47 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYB10H3
Professor
Elizabeth Page- Gould
Semester
Fall

Description
PSYB10: Lec 4: Attitudes & Persuasion; Conformity & Dissent Midterm1: Sat Oct 15, 1-2; doors open at 12:50PM SW319 Content: Lec 1-4, lecture content & readings associated 30 MC and 5 matching questions Skipping option: for any 2 questions you arent certain about, bubble in all answers wont count weighting re-distributed Practice Exam Questions/Topic Review Sheets/FAQs read Comparisons between certain topics Short Forms: Beh = behavior What are attitudes? -a like or dislike that influences our behavior towards someone/something -belief/idea that you hold for which youve ascribed some level of goodness or badness to: valence (positivity or negativity) of an attitude ABCs of Attitudes: Affective: Emotions you associate w/ attitude object/idea; How you feel about it Behavior: What youre likely to do as a response to your attitude Cognitive: What do you think about something? -2 characteristics of attitudes that matter in terms of how we think about them 1) valence: how good/bad you think something is; is a continuum 2) strength w/ which you hold them (ex: a person may have same level of valence about iphone = negative but the attitude is quite strong compared to another person) -can have similarly valenced attitudes w/ various strengths or vice versa -valence and strength are different dimensions; vary independently -explicit attitudes: attitudes you can state in words; you are fully aware you hold these attitudes and you can easily declare & describe them in words -stored in the form of a statement of which you are fully aware -implicit attitudes: simply an association you hold between some thing and the concept of good and bad -may or may not be aware of your implicit attitude; measure w/ rxn times -has to do w/ semantic network; words good (flowers, peace) and bad (war, famine) are concepts in semantic network -most ppl hold good implicit attitudes about flowers and bad implicit attitudes about famine LINK TO PROJECT IMPLICIT: implicit measurement tests online -originally assumed: what you believe about something is what is going to directly affect and predind your behavior towards that thing; 2 part: your behavior towards that thing changes your attitude/beliefs about it = more supported by lit -cognitive dissonance: idea that change in your behaviors changes your attitudes = revolutionary; fundamental aspect in attitude change & persuasion -dissonance: unpleasant feeling of arousal/anxiety that you get when your behavior is different from your attitudes/values -you experience unpleasant tension (dissonance) in body when: -you experience contradictory attitudes (ex: you love Justin Bieber, bf hates JB = conflict that would create internal tension; ALSO if you behave inconsistently w/ your attitude you hang out w/ ppl who hate JB, buy you love JB, but to fit in, you talk trash about JB inconsistent behavior w/ your attitudes have to reduce tension have few options) -key thing cognitive dissonance shows us you change attitude to match beh (few weeks later, find that you dont like JB as much) -phenomenon: how we act changes our behavior and how we have behave less rarely reflects how we feel/think -another option w/ cognitive dissonance: can reappraise situation so that beh no longer indicates anything about your attitude (much less common response) overjustification effect = if you can sufficiently justify your attitude-inconsistent behavior wont experience dissonance & wont change your attitudes (if no tension felt, then you dont need to change attitude to reduce tension) -cognitive dissonance study: -very boring task: turn wooden pegs for 45 min-debriefing, experimenter says need ppl to be motivated for the task (for future participants) and says one of 3 things: 1) give you $20 extra if you lie to other participant it was fun 2) key condition for cognitive dissonance: give $1 for lying to future participant about how much fun task was 3) control: thanks for participating, no beh thatll be incongruent because participant not asked to do anything -one week later, someone from lab (not connected w/ original study) calls up all participants and says they are curious about the quality of their experiments and how enjoyable the study they participated in was (measure of attitudes) -graph: ppl who were paid $1 to lie said a week later that the original task had been significantly enjoyable (these ppl had changed their attitudes to be congruent w/ the lie=beh they told) compared to controls who said a week later that the task was NOT enjoyable -when ppl got $20 to lie, it shows the reappraisal option where your behavior isnt totally inconsistent w/ your attitudes, then you dont have as much of a change in your attitudes as a result of your beh; $20 = big mon
More Less

Related notes for PSYB10H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit