Class Notes (923,841)
CA (543,275)
UTSG (45,894)
POL101Y1 (1,189)
Lecture

NATIONALISM LECTURE

6 Pages
94 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POL101Y1
Professor
Jeffrey Kopstein

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 6 pages of the document.
Nationalism and Conflict
Definition of nationalism:
The ideology attached to a specific nation. A nation is a group that wants to have its
own state.
The nation being a group of people with a common culture, religion, ethnicity, or
political allegiance.
Traditional arguments support the idea that nationalism is the product of the
nation. However, we find that the reverse is actually true: nationalism leads to the
creation of a nation.
Nations do not invent nationalism. Instead, nationalism invents nations. Nations do
not exist outside of the imagination of the ideology of nationalism
Nationalism manifests itself as the love of state, which in turn leads to the creation
of state embodying the spirit of the nation it represents
Nationalism says that the state and nation should be congruent. Nations should
have states. The leaders of the states should share with the masses a common
culture, language, history, religion, etc.
Nationalism and Modernization:
States appearing under these circumstance only ever occurs in the modern context
Raises a hypothesis that there has to be something about modernity that fuels
nationalism
High culture and low cultures: European monarch and populations Historically,
monarchs of European states did not necessarily share the same nationality as their
people. The last Tsar and Tsarina communicated with English, not even their first
language. There was no need for cultural congruence. Today, if the Russian
President did that, they wouldnt be seen as ‘Russians, not legitimate
Along with industrialization came the need to universalize culture.
Nations created governments for themselves as a means to standardize culture and
political allegiance.
www.notesolution.com
Never before in human history did people insist that their leaders be of the same
culture and never did leaders try to make the people share their culture ( This is a
modern phenomenon)
Its this need for congruence that needs to be explained
Formation of Common Culture:
How is that common culture created? In order to create a standard you need an
organization to do it, to impose it : States can impose it
States decide which language to educate the masses in, and this is momentous as
things in themselves but are the products of aggregated individual beliefs.
But stakes are very high: if YOUR culture is not adopted as the high (and universal)
culture, you face systematic disadvantage
In industrial societies, states are service organizations for providing common
cultures: education
This all accounts for why nationalism is a modern event. There was no need back
then. It served nobodys interest that everyone speak the same language and share a
common culture.
Despite common belief, national identity is usually manufactured by certain
similarities between members of a community. Once a national government is
formed, then we have the integration of people into the state based on their cultural
ideas and their political allegiance towards the states high culture.
Minority cultures within a superculture end up being at a systematic disadvantage
due to language barriers and other factors. With the nationalistic state, the
government educates the population on its culture as a means to maintain its
identity and to recruit new members into its culture.
In the examples of Ukraine, Hungary and Slovakia, we have nations that were
grouped together based on a language base that resulted into borders being formed
along a language line. The result being states consisting of people with a common
language base.
Ukraine Until the 19th century, most Ukrainians didnt know they were
Ukrainian.Over time, as the Russians themselves started to define their own high
culture, the native speakers of the Ukrainian language knew they were being
systematically disadvantaged in the Russian states. So, the Ukrainian-language
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Nationalism and Conflict Definition of nationalism: The ideology attached to a specific nation. A nation is a group that wants to have its own state. The nation being a group of people with a common culture, religion, ethnicity, or political allegiance. Traditional arguments support the idea that nationalism is the product of the nation. However, we find that the reverse is actually true: nationalism leads to the creation of a nation. Nations do not invent nationalism. Instead, nationalism invents nations. Nations do not exist outside of the imagination of the ideology of nationalism Nationalism manifests itself as the love of state, which in turn leads to the creation of state embodying the spirit of the nation it represents Nationalism says that the state and nation should be congruent. Nations should have states. The leaders of the states should share with the masses a common culture, language, history, religion, etc. Nationalism and Modernization: States appearing under these circumstance only ever occurs in the modern context Raises a hypothesis that there has to be something about modernity that fuels nationalism High culture and low cultures: European monarch and populations Historically, monarchs of European states did not necessarily share the same nationality as their people. The last Tsar and Tsarina communicated with English, not even their first language. There was no need for cultural congruence. Today, if the Russian President did that, they wouldnt be seen as Russians, not legitimate Along with industrialization came the need to universalize culture. Nations created governments for themselves as a means to standardize culture and political allegiance. www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit