Lecture 9: Women’s Imprisonment 11/6/2013 1:57:00 PM
sociologies of punishment:
in the case of women in. there is a direct line of feminist input
because of this, we have a process which we have
there are various phases of feminist input: each time one occurs,
sometime later, subsequent feminists are critical of it
often, critical because they feel despite the effort, actually what was
happening was reproducing patriarchal ideas
each generation looks at results of previous input
Start by saying: there are people who dispute the following
women commit far less crim then men
make up small percentage of prison pop.
nearly 50% of men in western society have criminal record
o only 15% for female
o this also true in self-report studies
not only committing less crimes, but those who do commit, commit less
crimes, and less violent in nature (their violence are against family
members)
its important to recognize women do commit a lot of crime
there is a tendency to think it is very rare
its not that fucking rare
because of comparative rarity, there is tendency to think we need
exceptional explanation of women offending
because they offend less, you need to reach for some odd
explanation why they did it, i.e. emotional disturbance
the explanations are very "feminine"
courts think along this line
this is wrong: when you look at women offending, its understandable
the women are powerless and victimized
crimes make sense for them in their situation (welfare fraud,
prostitution, low level in drug, etc.)
against the insight of contemp. fem., women offending is medicalized
more likely to have psy. evaluations
courts more likely to listen to these courts
these reports can exonerate the situation
then, more likely to receive more disputations involving psychology
(i.e. community treatment or imprisonment with therapy) Book by Joe Sim: if you read Foucault main book, women’s prisons look
more like his picture
there is idea of psy. involvement in women’s correctional
experiences
this similar to youth
in terms of what the courts do, there are series of ironies about psy.
thinking about the crimes women commit, and who they are and how
they present themselves
one hand: women who show emotional disturbances in feminine way
treated one way in the courts
imply lesser punishment
other hand: women who are much more assertive/aggressive and who
won’t feminine (i.e. not heteronormative) are punished more severely, by
both the courts and the psychologists
psychological engagement with women is viewed by fem. as very
suspicious
there’s a structure problem
women’s programing beyond psyotherapy, is criticized as being
inadequate
o not enough, not enough variety, under funded
o some of the services are based on male programs that aren’t
appropriate
some has been very sexist—sources in being secretary
emphasis on mother hood, teaching motherhood skills to offenders
women imprisonment involves problems which pull in all directions,
not specific to women’s experiences
lets clarify something:
it can be tempting to think the best way to see deifferent in gender
is to treat them the same way—picking out differences is
discrimination
you would also think would show differences in certain light to
make it fair
once you try and identify differences to women situations, you open
up a can of worms
people can say what you are doing is unfair or unjust o ppl argue over the difference in treatmen
More
Less