HUMA 1825 Lecture Notes - Lecture 8: Moral Agency, Procedural Justice, Legal Positivism
47 views3 pages
30 Oct 2013
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
There is a connection, nexus, between the following concepts: the concept of the rule of law, rule of reason, the law as serving the common good. The rule of law is seen as the rule of reasons and law is connected to serve the purpose for the common good ! Aristotle emphasized the important role of reason and rationality in cultivating virtues, especially the highest virtue justice. This is a notion of virtues as aspirational. Hence we do not permit a human being to rule as a lawgiver because a human being is not just reason but irrationality with passion, desire and appetite. The rule of man: we have irrationality, arbitrariness and wilt power. The rule and measure of human acts is the reason. Law: is an ordinance of the reason for the common good made by him who has care of the community and promulgated (pg. 55) Human law is a purposive activity; same concept in fuller.
Get access
Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers
Related Documents
Related Questions
Rand's Objectivism Aristotle's concept of Virtue Thomas Aquinas' concept of conscience Socrates' concept of excellence |
Sentiment in response to the suffering of others Acknowledging the sufferings of others Acts of altruism Acts contrary to Objectivism |
Setting aside ethical criteria in special cases Taking steps to avoid condemnation of others Using one set of criteria for judging cases concerning ourselves and another for all others Suspending judgment when concerned that the consequences would be too severe |
To indicate that one choice is better than others To show what actions are legal To convey requirements and obligations To indicate that there are really no choices available |
Kant's Categorical Imperative Social Contract Theory Ethical Egoism Gilligan |
A perpetual state of warfare The establishment of a monarchy Taxation to support the costs of government Organized ways to select leaders |
Hydroelectric power Tidal flow generators Biomass waste systems Solar cells |
The social contract according to Locke Deontological ethics according to Mill Natural law ethics according to Aquinas Deontological ethics according to Kant |
Ends-based Economy-based Law-based Efficiency-based |
To determine whether the situation described is accurate To determine whether the premises are true before continuing To determine whether the conclusion proceeds from the premises To determine that there are only two premise statements in the syllogism |
Some choices of action are more realistic than others In deciding to choose one action, the other possible choices will be lost Not everybody involved will be happy with the choice There may be significant personal costs to choosing |
Personal virtues Self-interest Ability to learn lessons Conscience |
Accounting for unintended consequences Fiduciary interests to be honored The amount of happiness produced The principle to be honored |
Rawls' notion of the veil of ignorance Aristotle's notion of the doctrine of the mean Hammurabi's code of law Hobbes' state of nature |
Normative ethics Consequentialist ethics Deontological ethics Interdisciplinary ethics |
Aristotle Luther Augustine Socrates |
Personal standards of behavior for family members Pricing structures for services Non-competition among members Meeting ethical and competency standards in order to practice within a jurisdiction |
There is no deficiency Being broke (having no money) Stinginess Moderation |
conflict resolution systems. objectivist tactics. primary schools of ethics. care-based ethics. |
Principles of ethics Concern for outcomes Emotions Subjective sense of identity |