MODR 1730 Lecture Notes - Lecture 27: Argument From Analogy, Full-Time Equivalent, Toyota Electronic Modulated Suspension
27 Mar 2019
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Grm ! chpt 13 (read on february 24th 2019) Chapter thirteen: pg 341 to pg 363: evaluative critique- pg 340, argumentative essay- pg 340, macro - structure - pg 341, micro- structure - pg 341, scope, clarity, structure, argumentation, objectivity. You don"t write an essay without knowing its goals / purpose. In this essay i argue that there are fallacious arguments in the grind. I show that arguments from both the pro and con sides of the grind are guilty of providing arguments that are irrelevant to their beliefs. In the grind there are some arguments against the tradition that are stated by an authority. Not only is the authority problematic, but all arguments from the authority are also flawed - acceptable only to a sympathetic audience. Remember your lines of argument in terms of (1) strength and (2) dependency: argumentation. Do not assume your audience agrees with your assumptions. Can you address counter-arguments or criticisms of your analyses: formatting.
