MODR 1760 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Psychological Egoism, Relativism, Rational Agent

88 views5 pages

Document Summary

Moral non-cognitive-whatever this is, is the conclusion and premise should prove why the conclusion is right (valid argument) Both of these are against ethics and how ethics is a mistake- they differ in what the mistake contains of. Ex: this is valid but wrong info, replace it with what"s true if people are fallible then they never think about ethics properly. Suppose u have sound argument, which of following is true: all true premises, valid c) true conc, all of the above, none of the above. Bring greatest amount of good to greatest amount of people. You might not know full consequences of you action- you will have a hard time knowing what is good or bad, so utilitarianism says it is not theory"s fault, it"s the way the world is. If you are doing something- it results in good consequences- you did a good thing. The #"s matter- you should bring about the best consequences.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions