PHIL 1000 Lecture Notes - Lecture 13: Virtue Ethics, Deontological Ethics, Consequentialism

32 views4 pages
PHIL1000 Lecture Nov 9th 11/9/2015 4:35:00 PM
Aristotle: Plato’s student
he provided a diff kind of explanation than Plato and they’re more empirical
since based on experience
rationalization vs. empiricism
Plato: dialogues while aristo: essays
“ shouldn’t discriminate women” –Plato
everybody should have access to stuff like education
Socrates: women cant be philosophers
Aristotle: bcuz he is empirical, would justify practices that seem absurd, he
defends slavery and they cant make decisions of their own
He names the book ethics but argues about politics and how to get along
with city. Phil knowledge has to do w the right kind of upbringing.
How he differentiates: our upbringing is where we start to learn very
important features! (-) what is the structured proper upbringing in society
look like?
To be a good critic= good education
political science is his way of …?
the end of this science is action, social experiences allow us to critique the
data from everyday experiences to do politics
moral knowledge requires life experiences, moral knowledge leads to
happiness. Children cant be happy? You can be a balanced indv after having
a lot of life experiences. Ethics=balanced indv (life experiences required)
Darwin: the context matters for survival
Aristotle: God made everything up, purposes to everything, God made the
world for a purpose.
Moral purposes to which things are geared = ethics
goal of human beings is unomonia- way to assess the quality of humans life
in terms of virtue.
The end of our lives happiness or the word above
Aristotle introduces the moral luck- if u have it your lucky distinguished the
life of 2 good people. You can’t control luck, having a good life entails having
factors beyond you, you limit the restrictions of outer forces. If lucky its
nothing you control. Part of having a good life is luck. You need the good
upbringing is part of the luck you have no control over, you just need to
accept it. No one can called happy if they have misfortunes- it’s an activity
of your life. (Plato- only the just person can be happy)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 4 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Aristotle: plato"s student he provided a diff kind of explanation than plato and they"re more empirical since based on experience rationalization vs. empiricism. Shouldn"t discriminate women plato everybody should have access to stuff like education. Aristotle: bcuz he is empirical, would justify practices that seem absurd, he defends slavery and they cant make decisions of their own. He names the book ethics but argues about politics and how to get along with city. Phil knowledge has to do w the right kind of upbringing. You can be a balanced indv after having a lot of life experiences. Aristotle: god made everything up, purposes to everything, god made the world for a purpose. Moral purposes to which things are geared = ethics goal of human beings is unomonia- way to assess the quality of humans life in terms of virtue. The end of our lives happiness or the word above.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents