Class Notes (837,194)
Canada (510,160)
York University (35,409)
Psychology (4,109)
PSYC 1010 (1,346)
Lecture

PSYC 1010 (JUBIS)- SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR.docx

3 Pages
44 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 1010
Professor
Rebecca Jubis
Semester
Fall

Description
PSYC 1010 REBECCA JUBIS Wednesday, November 7, 2012 SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 1) SOCIAL COGNITION- the study of the way we perceive and evaluate others a) Making attributions b) The way we form attitudes 2) SOCIAL INFLUENCE- studies the way people influence each other’s behaviors and attitudes a) Obedience b) Helping behavior a) Obedience  Agreeing to someone else’s command or request by obeying the authority figure - Milgram- how far will people go to command to people’s requests? Studies became unethical  Ad put out in newspaper looking for participants on learning- teacher/leaner, learner was actor (electroshock experiment) 1) Remote Condition- 65% fully obedient 2) Voice Feedback- 62.5% fully obedient 3) Proximity- 40% fully obedient 4) Touch Proximity- 30% fully obedient 5) No Contact- 100% fully obedient 6) Experiment Proximity- dropped 65%-22% fully obedient 7) Co-Teacher- 10% fully obedient - Factors That Affect Willingness to Obey: 1) Social Norm- not breaking an agreement 2) Surveillance- teacher looking over 3) Buffer- separates teacher from learner; fewer the buffers, less likely the obedience 4) Responsibility- 93% fully obedient  Subject (teacher)- pull switch  Actor- delivers shock 5) Importance of Science- taken out of typical laboratory study, dropped 65%- 48% - Criticisms of Milgram’s Study  Exposed individuals to extreme stress  Why put people under stress, if real life doesn’t generalize natural day-to-day situations; upsets other’s that individuals are engaging in this kind of behaviour (controversy after results of study)- if situational pressures are there, anyone would obey orders to inflict harm Compliance  Agreeing to someone else’s command or request - Compliance Without Pressure 1) Foot in the Door Technique  People are more willing to comply with a larger request when they first agree to a smaller request o E.g. small request to drive to subway, then asking to be driven home 2) Door in the Face Technique  People are more likely to comply with a smaller request if they first turn down a larger one o E.g. extreme request to drive home, then just ask to be driven to subway 3) Low-Ball Technique  2 step technique where you get somebody to comply with a request but
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 1010

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit