CRIM 330 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Reid Technique, Canada Evidence Act, Fundamental Justice

20 views8 pages

salmonleopard879

29 May 2022

School

Simon Fraser University

Department

Criminology

Course

CRIM 330

Professor

Helene Love

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Cl confession rule: r v oickle, aka voluntariness rule, if admission made to pia, crown must establish bard that choice wasn"t overborne by. If testify trial, right not to have evidence used against you in separate trial. If yes, were statements elicited: undercover police in detention, r v herbert. Derivative evidence: derivative confession, lri, depends on connection, derivative evidence, real evidence found on basis of confession. Tim bosma murder: executed warrants, witnesses, cellphone records & text messages, real evidence, tooth, truck, dna, gun powder residue on tool box, arrested mark smich & dellen millard for fist degree murder. Disclosure: s. 7, right to make full answer & defence, principle of fundamental justice, stinchcombe, crown duty to disclose all relevant information, depends on police disclosure, continuing, discretion if jeopardize witness/investigation. Third party disclosure: third party records, o"connor, 278. 1 sexual assault cases, records held by psychologist, probative to issue at trial, could reasonably be used by defence.

Related Questions

Article

Philip Pilkington: Confessions of a Non-Utilitarian Shopper

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/10/philip-pilkington-confessions-of-a-non-utilitarian-shopper.html

Questions

1) What are Pinkerton"s criticisms of "marginal utility"?

2) What examples does he give?

viridiantoad440

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/10/philip-pilkington-confessions-of-a-non-utilitarian-shopper.html

According to the article, What are Pinkerton's criticisms of âmarginal utility?

periwinklekoala595

The following example demonstrates how a net-worth analysisassisted prosecutors in amending their complaint against a fraudsuspect:

R. Peery, age 40, the executive director of a five-statecommission planning a low-level radioactive waste dump, was chargedwith two new charges of felony theft. Peery was also charged withone federal count of wire fraud.

Peery was accused of wiring $80,000 to a personal account inGeorgia, and prosecutors said they suspected him of taking$600,000. He was also charged with two counts of using commissionfunds in Nebraska to buy cars: a 1990 BMW valued at $67,000, and a1991 BMW valued at $92,000.

Peery was paid $52,000 annually. He lived in a house valued at$305,000 and at the time of his arrest had six luxury cars,including Jaguars, Mercedes-Benzes, and BMWs.

An affidavit filed in the state case lists transfers totaling$600,000, including the $80,000 mentioned in the federal charge.The affidavit quotes the bookkeeper for the commission as havingtold the police that various expenditures recorded as legal fees,office supply costs, and other expenses had not been authorized aslegitimate commission business.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Using the information provided, create scenarios for how youwould go about performing direct analysis on records provided.Submit your homework here.

cerisejellyfish113

CRIM 330 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Reid Technique, Canada Evidence Act, Fundamental Justice

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

CRIM 330 Study Guide - Final Guide: Duty Counsel

CRIM 330 Final: Tutorial Problem #8

CRIM 330 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Duty Counsel, Fundamental Justice, Perjury

Related Questions