Related Questions

Brief and detail

If relativism is true, can you ever judge something as being morally wrong? Consider some really horrible actions, genocide, murder, slavery, torture or add your own. If you feel a relativist could say that these things are actually wrong, what gives them this ability? If they can't, why not?

Agree or disagree

Similarly to what I said in the first discussion on what morality means to us, I think everyone has their own set of moral principles and obligations. So I do think that relativism is true, to a point however. I used Adolf Hitler and the Nazi empire as an example in the first discussion so I will use that here. Hitler knew in his brain that what he was doing was good for his nation and arguably the world. Now, as a modern day society we can agree that was wrong. For him, it was good. In his own mind, he is right. But it is relative to the person. Generally speaking we all have similar notions of what is right and what is wrong. Most people would say that going out of your way to help someone else is a morally good principle. Selflessness in society is seen a good thing by the vast majority of people. When I say that relativism is good to a point, I mean that there is a general basis in society that deems actions as good or bad. And since most of us would all agree that hitlers actions were bad, then we say that he had bad moral principles, even though to him, they were good. It’s a little confusing even for me to put into words. Basically, if you actions are generally viewed in society as good, then you have good moral principles even if they vary from person to person. No one will have the exact same moral standards, but generally they all are very similar in society. So relativism is true until the point where the majority of society would deem your actions and wrong. I hope this makes sense.

Agree or disagree

If relativism is true, I don't think judging something as morally wrong is possible. Because the definition of ethical relativism is the moral standard only being correctly relative to each person/society, this means that the moral standard is created by you and/or the society you identify with and therefore eliminate the existence of an absolute moral principle. Since the moral standard is different for every individual, we cannot say that someone is morally wrong. If relativism is applied, that is. If a relativist were to say that they could judge someone as morally wrong, then that would contradict the main component of being a relativist. That every moral argument of yours is correct, therefore everyone else's is also correct. Quite problematic but that is my understanding on the matter

ell25

consider three point particles lying along the x axisseparatedby a distance d, as shown. These particles have charges-Q, +2Q, and-Q respectively. Note that the z axis is comingstraight up out ofthe paper from the location of the positivepoint charge.

(a) Calculate the electrostatic potential (y,.z) producedbythese charges at the arbitrary point [0,y,z] in the yzplane.

(b) Use your answer from part (a) along with asymmetryargument to calculate E (electric field) at the samearbitrarypoint. [ Note that if you like, you can check your answersfor E byusging the principle of superposition and the firld createdby apoint charge.

Consider a traveling wave described by the formula

$y_1(x,t) = A \sin(k x - \omega t)$ .

This function might represent the lateral displacement of a string, a local electric field, the position of the surface of a body of water, or any of a number of other physical manifestations of waves.

Part A

Which one of the following statements about the wave described in the problem introduction is correct?

ANSWER:

The wave is traveling in the

direction.
The wave is traveling in the

direction.
The wave is oscillating but not traveling.
The wave is traveling but not oscillating.

Part B

Which of the expressions given is a mathematical expression for a wave of the same amplitude that is traveling in the opposite direction? At time t=0

this new wave should have the same displacement as y_1(x,t)

, the wave described in the problem introduction.

ANSWER:

$A \cos (k x - \omega t)$
$A \cos (k x + \omega t)$
$A \sin (k x - \omega t)$
$A \sin (k x + \omega t)$

The principle of superposition states that if two functions each separately satisfy the wave equation, then the sum (or difference) also satisfies the wave equation. This principle follows from the fact that every term in the wave equation is linear in the amplitude of the wave.

Consider the sum of two waves , where is the wave described in Part A and is the wave described in Part B. These waves have been chosen so that their sum can be written as follows:

$y_{\rm s}(x,t) = y_{\rm e}(x) y_{\rm t}(t)$ .

This form is significant because , called the envelope, depends only on position, and depends only on time. Traditionally, the time function is taken to be a trigonometric function with unit amplitude; that is, the overall amplitude of the wave is written as part of .

Part C
Find and . Keep in mind that should be a trigonometric function of unit amplitude.

erinhyena808

PHL271H1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Order Of The British Empire, Stop Sign, Potluck

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

Management and Organizational Studies 2275A/B Chapter Notes - Chapter 11: Prima Facie, Reasonable Person, The Injury

PHIL 106 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Virtue Ethics, Intellectual Virtue, Harm Principle

ACCT352 Lecture 6: Chapter 13:14 REVIEW

Related Questions