1
answer
0
watching
204
views
1 May 2019

I have collected some data to compare the biodiversity of afield in which the plagioclimax is maintained by machine mowingwith a field in which the plagioclimax is maintained by sheepgrazing.

What I found was that there was a significant increase in floralbiodiversity in the field which was managed by agricultural grazingwhen compared to the floral biodiversity of the machine-mownfield.

I am trying to explain my findings, and I believe that it is dueto the comparitively short amount of time that machine-mowing hasbeen a grassland management technique, so there has been littletime for natural selection to take place and for species to developadaptations to machine-mowing (such as being low-lying, orextremely fast-growing). Whereas the field which is managed throughsheep-grazing, contains multiple competing species which haveadapted over time to grazing sheep, such as Cirsiumarvense.

Moreover, the field which is managed by grazing has nutrientsreturned to it through defecation of the grazing animals, allowingfor more favourable conditions for growth.

Is my explanation valid? Are there any other reasons whythe floral biodiversity of a field managed by sheep grazing wouldbe higher than one managed by machine-mowing?

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Lelia Lubowitz
Lelia LubowitzLv2
3 May 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in

Related textbook solutions

Related questions

Related Documents

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in