PSY100H1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Caffeine, Ingroups And Outgroups, False Alarm
65
PSY100H1 Full Course Notes
Verified Note
65 documents
Document Summary
Australia, us, france, finland, japan, canada (same effects) Usually based on trait judgments predict number of votes. Candidates from different parties also rated differently. Candidates from 2004 & 2006 us senate elections. Excluded 3rd party c; racial minorities (stereotype that racial minorities are democrats, especially black people) Results: accuracy significantly greater than chance guessing. Not due to a small number of highly legible faces. Not political ads (politics furthest from mind) Not due to a small number of selected pics. No difference in warmth between d and r. Correlate proportion of people categorizing each face as ds with mean ratings of power and warmth for each target. People who are d and look powerful look d. Therefore, power = vital cue as to what a p looks like. 0 = r ---------------------- what you look like. Asked 19 readers to judge 6 dutch politicians. 19 students rated 90 faces of labour + conservative mps.
