POL320 Midterm/Semester 1 Key Points

2 Pages
419 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL320Y1
Professor
Simone Chambers
Semester
Winter

Description
POL320 – Midterm – Key Points | Study Notes Enlightenment vs. Romanticism Rousseau vs. Rousseau – Authenticity vs. Legitimacy Kant & Herder – Head & Heart Burke & Wollstonecraft – Tradition & Emancipation Enlightenment Themes (3P2R) Enlightenment Values (LEAFA) Reason Liberty Religion Equality Public Sphere Fraternity Progress Autonomy Politics Authenticity Rousseau: Central Concepts  Equality/inequality  Pity/self-preservation/egocentrism o amour se soi | amour-propre  Reason/reflection  Sentiment/passion  Nature/convention  Authenticity 2 Rousseaus: 1. Authenticity has been threatened, perhaps destroyed, by progress. (Romantic ~ Discourse) 2. Reason tells us that we’re fundamentally free & that consent is the only basis of legitimate political rule. (Enlightenment ~ Social Contract) Kant  Morality doesn’t make sense unless universal  Humans aren’t things, can’t be used as such – each has immeasurable worth (reason, which all possess, tell us this) – dignity & respect  For all virtues: if bad character/intentions/will, could be used for bad things  Create a morality to which everybody has equal access; universal law* [of nature = irregularity]  Immorality = irrational, morality = rational  Only humans have purpose; choose ends & give values to those ends; our choices create value  Universalization; humans have immeasurable worth, dignity worthy of respect  Morality sets limits, doesn’t give direction – all perfect duties are don’ts – just create side constraints  Kant’s characterization of what it means to be human: dignity, respect & autonomy  Appraisal-respect vs. Recognition-respect  Dualist view: reason & appetite; most important faculty of human beings is their rational faculty; distinct, in opposition to appetites, desires, inclinations  Radical autonomy = the notion of a free will 1. Good will & duty a. Good will = good intentions b. Good intentions, virtues & results c. Good intention = acting from duty d. Acting from duty vs. acting in conformity with duty: misanthrope e. Duty – law – universal law 2. Categorical Imperative st Hypothetical vs. categorical 1 formulation: act only in accordance with the maxim through which you can at the same time will that it becomes universal law. 2 : act as if the max
More Less

Related notes for POL320Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit