RL200 Study Terms.docx

5 Pages

Course Code
Peter King

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
RL200 Study Notes Terms Jonathan Z. Smith on three features of our modern use of “religion”: 1) “Religion” is not a native category, 2) “Religion” is universal, and 3) It is an anthropological, not theological term. It describes human thought and action, especially in terms of belief and behavior. The Protestant Reformation: the authority of the Church of Rome found itself under attack by protestant movements. Christians might accept that divine truth was singular and eternal, but no institution could claim full authority on its interpretation any longer and the idea of singular religious truth was in tatters. “Natural Religion”: one very important development in this regard was the concept of “natural religion”. It represents the Age of Enlightenment searching for a rational and tolerant account of global diversity. Understood as a pure and ancient religion of nature that had been embraced by all human beings in its earliest development. Proposed religion was a universal feature of human beings. An inclination to perceive and relate to “supernatural beings” was part of being human in all places and all times. New era of representation of religion in Europe: in line with the natural religion concept, they often used data about different religions to come up with descriptions that privileged similarity, and made claims for universality, innateness, and a shared origin. Difference was attributed to historical development (progressive or degenerative)  David Hume set out to answer in his essay Natural Religion (1751) (part of his 1757 Four Dissertations) makes two very important moves: 1) he throws away the idea that religion is some kind of original human instinct, exactly the same everywhere, and says that religion comes from something else in the human experience. 2) that “something else” is hope and fear, whose unknown causes are personified through imagination “Survivals”: for Tylor, all human societies are on one evolutionary road, but at any given moment different societies are at different stages. Even within a given society, we will find examples of older, less-evolved thought patterns. This was his idea of “survivals”: “processes, customs, and opinions, and so forth, which have been carried on by force of habit into a new state of society different from that in which they had their original home, and they thus remain as proofs and examples of an older condition of culture out of which a newer has been evolved.” How do we identify what is a “survival” and what is “modern” and “civilized” (an up to date cultural form)??? For Tylor it is really straight forward! whatever “the existence, in practice or memory, within the limits of modern civilized society, of... customs which civilized ideas totally fail to account for.” (Pals 2012, 7)! In other words, whatever can’t be rationalized from the point view of a certain sort of educated western European male must be a survival! Animism: two occurrences that intrigued the “savage philosopher”, whose explanation started religion: death and dreams. At death, some life force seems to leave the body, and in dreams, a shadow image appears tod o the same. Tylor argues that primitive peoples took the next logical step and came up with a basic idea of a soul that animates the person from within. Tylor then argued that primitive peoples began to apply the concept to all aspects of their life-world (oceans, stars, plants, animals, etc.). The next step in this logic was the idea that behind all phenomenon was a trope of good and bad spirits (like gods of Greece and Rome) helping to animate the whole world, disconnected from any specific objects or people. This basic animism idea then evolved into the monotheism of Islam and the Judeo-Christian tradition. The “savage magician”: Frazer argued that primitive peoples had tried to develop a way of controlling the world (not just explaining it) that had to do with two types of influence: Imitative magic: “like affects like”, mimicking the sound of thunder to bring rain, drawing a deer kill in order to make it come about in real life, etc. And Contagious magic: “part affects part”, for instance when a shaman gets ahold of someone’s hair or clothing and can then exert control over them. In this way again, the savage magician and his magic is the primitive other of the enlightened scientist and his prestigious science! Reductivist approach to the study of religion: asks what is the thing that explains and unites all these people Totem and Taboo: Resemblances Between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics (1913): Not history but a meditation on the psyche. Original religious moment in human experience is the totem sacrifice.Like animism for Tylor, and magic for Frazer, however for Freud it is neurosis and illusion, not misplaced rationalism.The totem is the substitute for the absent father figure, Freud interpreted the emotional ambivalence of children in his own day to their fathers as the evidence for a childish ambivalence in all times and places. This is externalized into a belief in a supernatural Father figure (God, etc.). Elaborates based an ancient case of patricide and incest, whose emotional legacy of guilt, fear and memory. Our moral complex, social organization, and religious attitdes are for Freud founded in a moment of intense hatred and guilt in relation to the father. This is exactly the same story he heard from his neurotic patients; of the repressed urges and memories he identified as emanating firm the unconscious of those suffering from neurosis. So, what is the hatred guilt all about in the end? Craving for power and sexual desire of course. Opedipus Complex: Out of guilt and fear comes what Freud calls the “Two taboos of totemism and of the Oedipus compelx”: Forbidding the killing of the totem/father, and the prohibition of sexually possessing his wives/incest. Basic point: religion enforces taboos that help keep at bay our all too human violent and sexual urges. Like other theorists like Marx and Durkheim, religion is reduced to its role in keeping social order. Freud identifies the Opedipus complex at the root of our collective and individual experience. It is the root of all art, religion morality, and society itself, just as it is at the root of our own psychological complexes, dreams, unconscious urges, repressed feelings, and human relationships. We all share a “heritage of emotion”. Future of an Illusion (1927): In this text Freud further connects faith in God (the Judeo-Christian God of his own environs, we must remember) and obsessional neurosis. Belief in God is connected to a regression to a childhood need of a father (not a mother) to protect us from fear. Freud wants to know why religion is compelling, why it has strength, even though its claims are irrational? Because religion has psychological origins of course! Religious beliefs don’t come from experience or reason. The promise to fulfill our own deepest wishes (individually and collectively). For that reasons, they are illusions )but not entirely false). Freud again appeals to the past, here again assuming that our collective social evolution mirrors the evolution of our individual personality. Society and each of us is a constantly evolving psychosexual complex. Just as infantile neurosis must be repressed in order to develop into a functioning adult (civilized state), so too human society moved through infantile to civilized states defined by greater or lesser manifestations of neurosis and its repression. Id: this is the dark realm of our unconscious, where our repressed urgers, memories, images lie. It is the only part of the personality that is present from birth. Its antisocial tendencies (sex and violence) need to be repressed and balanced with the superego by the ego, in order to live stable, happy, fulfilled human lives Superego: the internalization of society’s rules and conventions, which we originally receive from our parents. This is the “reality principal”, where we eventually internalize the parent’s (and teachers, etc.) normative voice. This is our conscience and is in direct opposition to our id. This is also, Ego: this is the part of us that acts according to the reality principle the ego must constantly satisfy the demands of the Id and superego , or reality. This is what we often acall reason and common sense. It is our conscious planning, memory, strategizing mind. A ‘theory of religion’: is an answer to one of at least two questions: 1) what is the origin of religion and 2) what is the function of religion SO.....a theory of religion could try and answer when, where, why and how a specific religious movement (or even religion as a universal feature of humanity) arose. OR it could try and answer when, where, why and how a religious movement (or religion as a universal feature of humanity) functions alongside other features of society and culture (like a political or economic system, for instance). Collective Consciousness: Durkheim wanted to understand how social cohesion was created and maintained in human communities. Aforce arising from participation in a shared system of beliefs and values, which mold and control human behavior. This originates in the communal interactions and experiences of members of a society. Social Facts: the social and behavioral rules that exist before an individual is born into a society and which that person learns and observes as a member of that society. sacred vs. profane:‘first criterion of religious belief’. all known religious beliefs display this most fundamental opposition, which divide the world into two domains. all religions, beliefs, myths, dogmas etc. are representations that express the nature of sacred things (and their relationship to profane things). sacred things are held on a higher order than the profane, and on a higher order than humans as well. Protestant ethic: laid out his thesis that the Protestant Work ethic, which had developed in Northern Europe after the Reformation, contributed to the organization of labor which cause the rise of capitalism. The origins of capitalism in the Reformation: Protestant ethic: something which motivated adherents to work hard, be successful in business and reinvest their profits in further development rather than frivolous pleasures. Worldly asceticism (or calling): each individual had to take action in order to be saved; just being a member of the Church was not enough. Salvation shown through material success. Historical Materialism: "Society does not consist of individuals, but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand." Karl Marx, Grundrisse, 1858: "I use 'historical materialism' to designate the view of the course of history, which seeks the ultimate causes and the great moving power of all important historic events in the economic development of society, in the changes in the modes of production and exchange, with the consequent division of society into distinct classes and the struggles of these classes." A theory of history that responded to: Idealism (Hegel),that the main driver of historical change and evolution was ideas and an abstracted Spirit (Geist), and Materialism(Feuerbach),which saw religion and all other flights of cultural fancy as being firmly rooted in human beings. Marx was dissatisfied with Feuerbach’s reference to an abstracted human beings. Also, Marx wasn’t content to explain to religious world on the basis of the secular one
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.