HREQ 1920 EXAM REVIEW (FALL TERM).doc

6 Pages
388 Views

Department
Human Rights and Equity Studies
Course Code
HREQ 1920
Professor
Nadiah Habib

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 6 pages of the document.
Description
Male and Female Mid-term Exam The mid-term exam will be two hours long and take place in class on Tuesday, December 6, 2011. There are two parts to the exam. Part I is based on concepts we have covered in the course. Eight concepts from the list below will appear on the exam, you must answer five. Each will be graded out of 5 points: 2 for the definition, 2 for stating the significance of the concept in terms of the text in which it is found and the wider context of the course, 1 pt for the identification of an author or text in which the concept was discussed. Note: You must use a different text or author for each concept. You must use full sentences in response to each concept. Part II requires you to answer one of the three questions provided below in an essay style format. Two of the three questions listed below will appear on the exam, you will answer one for 25 pts. Your answer should provide a thesis statement and three arguments and/or evidence in support of your thesis. You should draw on the literature in the course in support of your position. Part I (25 points) -> significance, meaning in the context of the article Dominant Ideology: Judith Lorber, “Believing Is Seeing: Biology as Ideology” -set of interrelated belief that describes how the world works and prescribes how it should. This appears natural to us, but nothing is natural about it. Reinscribes and backs up the status quo and opposes change. Significance: dominant ideology reinscribes and backs up the status quo and opposes change. Eugenics: Potential Readings David M. Buss, “ Psychological Sex Differences through Sexual Selection” Robert Sapolsky, “Testosterone Rules” -theory that natural selection can occur through conscious efforts to improve human population, by decreasing/preventing production of ‘unfit’ or increasing health and fitness of reproductive population  Alberta introduced a sterilization program -> sterilized men and women who appeared to be mental instable  First nation women lived differently then the white women of this generation (did not believe in god, multiple sex partners, etc.) so they were targeted quite normally to be sterilized  First nations = 2% of canada’s pop. at that time, 20% of who were sterilized, were first nations Significance: Anthropomorphism: Anthropocentrism: regarding man as the most important and central factor in the universe? Penis Envy: Sigmund Freud, “Femininity,” (check website) penis envy -> around the age of 3 – 5 -how infant becomes girl- since neither girl nor mother has penis, girl is angry at her first love, mother, for this and identifies with father. Desire for penis must transform to a wish for a baby. Significance: Gender is not a natural acquisition but a long process of struggle, loss, and constant instability. Therefore it can be concluded that it is ever changing. Also, penis envy may instead equal envy of the promise of patriarchal power and privilege in a male dominated society. Therefore it reinforces male dominance and power. Patriarchy: Michael Kimmel, “Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity,” [KIT]. Male dominance ->manhood of the traditional aristocracy, the class that embodied the virtue of liberty Intersexed: “Affronting Reason” Cheryl Chase Intersexed children always assigned to male or female Being born with both sexual organs (enlarged clitoris) Humanly possible – in our culture socially unacceptable born with an xx chromosomes or xy chromosomes, who are born as true hermaphrodites, born with male and female sex organs Significance: intersexed challenges the idea that there are simply just two genders (male and female). Normalization: picodian term Hierarchies of gender: Performativity of gender: Potential readings Anne Fausto-Sterling, “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are Not Enough” pp. 20-26 [Reader]; Cheryl Chase “Affronting Reading” Butlers’ account of the formation of gender subjectivity resists any account of the origin or source of our gendered characteristics in either biological or psychological structures. She argues that through our gender performances we can choose to enact our gender subjectivities and subvert gender constructs. The human body in Butler’s work is seen as a product. It becomes a signifier of gendered identities. There is no sense that there is anything about the body itself that is playing any role in the production or femininity or masculinity. These become bodily styles inscribed on a docile body—on a blank surface. Through her work on performative understanding of gender, Butler appears to have removed any necessary link between masculinity, femininity and what are commonly termed male and female bodies. Judith Butler’s Queer Theory - the choice to enact our gender subjectivities and subvert gender construction. There is no link between masculinity and femininity and what is referred to as “male” and “female” bodies. - human body = product, a signifier of gendered identities Hegemonic masculinity: Michael Kimmel, “Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity,” [KIT]. -> Shelley Pacholok Significance: hegemonic masculinity reinforces dominant norms of masculinity, and ostracizes those who deviate from the norm. It also helps to explore the measure of others, and power relations between men and women. ← -> dominant norms of masculinity ← dominant masculine norms, values & beliefs = powerful, better/professional, good jobs, fearless, lack emotion, rational, sexually aggressive, heterosexual, physically dominant, white, middle/upper class ← -> concept to help explore the measure of others, and power relations between men and men and as well as to measure the disparities between man and man, cultural norms of masculinity powerless in our society include: gays - concept of dominant norms of masculinity used to explore the power relations and the measures of others. Cannot exist unless there are subordinated others. -hegemonic masculinity = image of masculinity of those men who hold power, which has become the standard in psychological evaluations, sociological research, and self-help and advice literature for teaching young men to become ‘real men’ hegemonic definition of manhood – man in power, a man with power & a man of power Exaggerated Femininity: “It’s Part Of The Game” women learn to emphasize their femininity in compliance with gender inequality oriented to accommodate the male desire organized around real or apparent compliance with gender inequality and is oriented to accommodating the interest and desires of men
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit