Textbook Notes (367,894)
Canada (161,478)
Philosophy (44)
PHIL 240 (10)

PHIL 240 State of Nature - Rousseau & Anarchists

2 Pages
Unlock Document

PHIL 240
Adam Etinson

Rousseau Believed also that self-preservation was the ultimate goal of mankind, but also believed that humans were capable of benevolence. Does not doubt that a modern citizen, corrupted by society, would behave as Hobbes depicted. However, objects to the State of Nature as described by Hobbes and Locke, who are accused of projecting the qualities of civilization onto the savage man. Believes man to be born capable of the State of Nature, but that he is corrupted by society. Does not advocate a return to a State of Nature, for that is impossible for man that is corrupted by society; nevertheless, he expresses regret at the present conditions. Argument that man in State of Nature will be compassionate is not based on the existence of a natural moral code, as in Locke, but his belief that man is naturally harm-averse, and will seek to minimize/avoid it in himself and in others. Therefore, Rousseau's view is emotional, and not necessarily logical. Admits that while a strong savage would avoid harming a weak if an alternative method of self-sustenance was available, this compassion would not be strong enough in the case of resource scarcity and competition.
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 240

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.