Textbook Notes (368,280)
Canada (161,762)
Psychology (3,337)
PSYC 2650 (228)
Chapter

PSYC*2650 Ch 15.pdf

8 Pages
99 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 2650
Professor
Anneke Olthof
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 15: Conscious Thought, Unconscious Thought - much of the progress in understanding consciousness has come not from examining consciousness directly but from studying what happens in the absence of it - showed when consciousness is and is not needed - there is still much about it we do not understand and still agreement about how it should be defined and studied Consciousness - a state of awareness of sensations or ideas, such that we can reflect on those sensations and ideas, know what it “feels like” to experience these sensations and ideas, and can, in many cases, report to others that we are aware of the sensations and ideas The Cognitive Unconscious - our intellectual lives require elaborate support structure even though they feel like theyʼre quick and effortless Cognitive Unconscious - activity of which we are completely unaware but that makes possible our ordinary interactions with the world - behind-the-scenes activity - the cognitive unconscious is rather different from the fort of thing that many people have in mind when they speak of “unconscious” thoughts or memories - Freud argued that the unconscious mind has tis own goals and its own logic - modern psychologists believe that processes that unfold in the cognitive unconscious are in no sense threatening, nor are they actively suppressed, these processes donʼt have an agenda separate from that of the conscious mind - instead the cognitive unconscious serves and supports the conscious mind, specifically, it involves the underlying processes that make conscious experience possible - in this way, the cognitive unconscious may seem less exotic than the unconscious but it is rich, powerful and intriguing Unconscious Processes, Conscious Products - we are aware of the products created within our minds but unaware of the processes that led to these products - people usually cannot tell when they are genuinely remembering something and when they have instead inferred/assumed or imaged that something append The Influence of Unconscious Attributions - the role of the unconscious is also evident in studies of implicit memory - in these studies, participants are plainly being influenced by events they cannot consciously recall - this influence often seems to require several steps of reasoning - we are generally unaware of our own thinking - similar in cases involving source confusion - our unconscious thinking can sometimes be rather sophisticated, with layers of inference and reasoning - this sophistication is particularly evident when the unconscious thinking involves a Causal Attribution - reasoning about the cause to which we should attribute some fact - Nisbett and Schachter asked their participants to endure a series of electric shocks, with each shock being slightly more severe, wanted to see how far they would go - before some participants were given a pill that they were told would diminish the pain but would have side effects such as shaking hangs, butterflies in the stomach etc - this pill was a placebo with no analgesic properties or side effects - remarkably, participants who took the pill accepted 4 times as much shock - proposed that the control participants noticed that their hands were shaking, their stomach was upset (reactions to electric shock) and used this as evidence that they were quite uncomfortable, asking for the shocks to be stopped - the placebo participants attributed the physical symptoms to the pill, so didnʼt worry about them, they were less influenced by somatic markers, overruled evidence of their own anxiety and misread their own internal state - the reasoning about the pill was entirely unconscious - note the complexity of the unconscious thinking in this experiment - the participants are reasoning about themselves in an intellectually sophisticated manner: observing symptoms, generating hypotheses about them, drawing conclusions - they reached erroneous conclusions excuse they had been misled Mistaken Introspections - it is useful to distinguish between the unconscious processes involved in thought and the conscious products that result from these processes - this distinction isnʼt always clear-cut - sometimes the processes of thought do seem to be conscious - sometimes you reason carefully and deliberately, weighing each step and scrutinizing each bit of logic - this sense of knowing oneʼs own thoughts may in some cases be an illusion - you feel like the processes were conscious, so that you know why you reached a conclusion or why you made a particular deacons, but you may be mistaken - e.g. in the electric shock study, participants had a belief about why they acted as they did but their beliefs were wrong - participants in another study read a brief except from a novel and asked to describe the emotional impact the excerpt had one them and why it had the impact - they were impressively consistent in their judgments but they were wrong - self-reports are offered with full confidence and in many cases the participants report that they carefully and deliberately thought about their actions and influences seemed in plain view - how could their introspections be so far off track? - the processes of thought are often unconscious - there is no way to introspect them by thinking of them - they use after-the-fact reconstruction which will sometimes be correct but sometimes totally wrong - they will go off track if the person simply hansʼt noticed some relevant factor in the current setting - itʼs striking that these after-the-fact reconstructions donʼt “feel life” inferences, when people explain their own behaviours theyʼre usually convinced that they are simply remembering their own mental processes based on some sort of “direct inspection” of what went on in their own minds - these reconstructions feel like genuine introspections Unconscious Guides to Conscious Thinking - sometimes we make discoveries based on a visual image that we carefully and unconsciously scrutinize - even here there is a role for the cognitive unconscious because even here an elaborate unconscious support structure is needed - a support structure that exists at the “fringe” or the horizon” of our conscious thought - evidence from this fringe comes from many sources, but a wide variety of cases in which our thoughts seem guided or influenced by an “unseen hand” - e.g. in our description of problem-solving, we emphasized the role of set (unnoticed assumptions and definitions that guide our search for the problemʼs solution - even when the problem-solving is conscious and deliberate, even when we think out loud about the steps of the problem solution, we are guided by a set - for the most part it is a good thing, because the set keeps us focused, protecting us from distracting and unproductive lines of thought, but it can sometimes be an obstacle to problem-solving and the fact that the set is unconscious makes it all the more difficult to overcome the obstacle - similarly, in the discussion of decision-making, we emphasized the importance of the decisionʼs frame, you might be completely focused on the decisions and fully aware of your options and your efforts toward choosing them - the evidence suggests that you will be heavily influenced by the unnoticed framing of the decision - the way the options are desired and the way the question itself is posed - you donʼt think about the framing itself but the framing unmistakably colours your thoughts about the decision and plays a large role in determining the outcomes of those thoughts - likewise, words and sentences can often be interpreted in more than one way - in all of these ways, our deliberate, conscious thinking is guided by an unnoticed framework - we are aware that we are thinking about something, but not aware of how this thinking is sharped by assumptions or associations lying in the background - the unconscious mental framework protects us from uncertainty and ambiguity and it shapes both the content and the sequence of our thoughts Blind Sight and Amnesia - patients who are suffering from Korsakoffʼs syndrome often have no conscious awareness of events they have witnessed to things they have done - they will insist they have no recollection, and fail on tasks that require recollection - yet they do remember these events in some sense: on tests of implicit memory, amnesic patients seem quite normal, making it clear that they are influenced in their present beliefs and behaviours by the specific content of the prior episodes - they can remember and be influenced by their memories with no conscious awareness - this is a pattern dubbed “memory without awareness” Blind Sight - a pattern observed in patients who have experienced damage to the striate cortex, they are blind - in one study they were forced to guess whether the stimuli were Xs or Os and quite reliably they “guessed” correctly - participants insisted they were randoms guesses - it seems in a sense they can “see” but they are not aware of seeing The Disadvantages of Unconscious Processing The Nature of Unconscious Performance - scrutinize the various activities we can perform without consciousness and ask what they have in common - two broad factors can be identified - first, the various cases of unconscious processing all seem to rely on well-established routines doing a well-defined job in an identifiable domain - we are unaware of the processes needed to make inferences about perceptual inputs - we are unaware of the processes that assign a “cause” to some detected effect - in each case, the processes are impressive, they carry out a specialized job - second, in all cases of unconscious processing people seem to be doing just what the situation requires - guided either by the situation itself or by prior habit Limits of Unconscious Performance - this leads to a proposal about unconscious processing and unconscious processing - perhaps we can perform tasks unconsciously if we arrive at the task with an already- established routine, directly applicable to that task, and if the routine can be guided entirely by strong habits or powerful cues within the situation - these routines can be highly efficient, but they are also inflexible, relying on customary, habitual, or stimulus-governed actions, and not subject control - this implies that there will be clear limits on our unconscious processes - the inflexibility in our unconscious routines will make it difficult and perhaps impossible to tune or adjust the routine - knowing this is no protection at all, the process of making inferences is automatic and effortless, and irresistible - similarly, the inflexibility in routine makes it all too easy for us to become victims of habit, relying on our customary actions or customary thought patterns even when we hope to avoid them - this is why problem-solving sets are so powerful and difficult to break out of - it is also the reason why Action Slips - doing something different from what you intent - take the form that they do - in most cases these slips in
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 2650

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit