Textbook Notes (368,463)
Canada (161,897)
Psychology (4,891)
Psychology 1000 (1,619)
Chapter 13

Chapter 13- Behaviour in Social Context

10 Pages
40 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
Psychology 1000
Professor
Shauna Burke
Semester
Spring

Description
Chapter 13: Behaviour in a Social Context 1 Social Thinking & Perception: Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behaviour: • attribution: judgements about the causes of our own & other people’s behaviours & outcomes - personal (internal): people’s behaviour is caused by their characteristics; i.e.Ab/c studied hard - situational (external): aspects of situation cause behaviour; i.e.Ab/c easy test - information that determines attributions: 1. consistency, 2. distinctiveness, 3. consensus • fundamental attribution error: we underestimate the impact of the situation & overestimate the role of personal factors when explaining other people’s behaviour - more info about present situation when making judgments about ourselves - perceptual principle of figure-ground relations • self-serving bias: making relatively more personal attributions for successes & more situational attributions for failures; i.e. athletes- winning (personal) vs losing (situational) • Westernized emphasis on individualism: attribute other people’s behaviour to personal factors • link between holistic thinking & beliefs about causality: information seeking differences b/w cultures & among individuals within each culture Forming & Maintaining Impressions: • primacy effect: tendency to attach more importance to initial information that we learn about a person; new info has to work harder to overcome initial impression - more alert during 1st info - 1st info may influence subsequent info - esp. for people who dislike ambiguity & uncertainty - i.e. athlete: great training, but bad competitions=bad luck, fatigue, etc. • recency: giving greater weight to most recent info; when asked to avoid snap judgements & consider evidence • schema: mental framework that help us organize & interpret info - i.e. told George is shy vs cold=diff impressions • stereotype: generalized belief about group or category of people - i.e. Hannah: blue-collar (lower rating) vs white-collar family (higher rating) Chapter 13: Behaviour in a Social Context 2 • self-fulfilling prophecy: w/o conscious awareness; when people’s erroneous expectations lead them to act toward others in a way that brings about expected behaviours, confirming original impression Attitudes &Attitude Change: • attitude: positive or negative evaluative reaction toward stimulus, i.e. person, action, object, concept • Richard LaPiere (1930): toured US w/Asian couple; prejudice • attitudes predict behaviours... 1. more strongly when counteracting situational factors are weak; i.e. financial incentives, conformity/obedience, groupthink - theory of planned behaviour: intention to behave in behaviour is strongest when we have positive attitude; when subjective norms support attitudes & believe behaviour is under control - i.e. screening for breast cancer, become smokers, seek therapy 2. greater influence when we are aware of them & when they are strongly held 3. general attitudes are better at predicting general classes of behaviour & specific attitudes are better at predicting specific behaviour • theory of cognitive dissonance: people strive for consistency in cognitions; when 2+ cognitions clash, person experiences uncomfortable state of tension (cognitive dissonance) - boring lab task: paid $1 vs $20 to tell student it was fun: $1=changed attitude about task to bring it more into line w/ how they behaved - counter-attitudinal behaviour: produces dissonance only if we perceive that our actions were freely chosen rather than coerced - heightened physiological arousal when engage in counter-attitudinal behaviour - dissonance at max: behaviour threatens sense of self-worth, produces negative consequences • self-perception theory: make inferences about our attitudes by observing how we behave - less likely to create significant arousal- still alter attitudes to be more consistent w/ behaviour • Persuasion: - communicator: communicator credibility- how believable communicator is - > expertise & trustworthiness (present truth in unbiased manner) - > point of view contrary to his/her own self interest Chapter 13: Behaviour in a Social Context 3 - > physically attractive, similar to us, likable - message: two-sided refutational approach=more effective - > moderate degree of discrepancy - > arouse fear (only moderate & ways to reduce threat); too much anxiety=disagree completely - audience: - > central route for persuasion: people think carefully about message & influenced b/c find arguments compelling; high need for cognition - > peripheral route for persuasion: people do not scrutinize message; influenced by other factors- speaker’s attractiveness, message’s emotional appeal; low need for cognition Social Influence: Mere Presence of Others: • performance improves in presence of coactors or passive, silent audience 1. physical presence of another person increases arousal 2. when arousal increases, we become more likely to perform dominant response - unskilled=audience decreases performance; skilled=audience increases performance • social facilitation: increased tendency to perform one’s dominant response in mere presence of others social norm: shared expectations about how people should think, feel & behave; binds social • systems together; regulate daily behaviour w/o conscious awareness, until violated • social role: set of norms that characterizes how people in given social position ought to behave - i.e. Philip Zimbardo- Stanford prison study • personal space when communicating Sherif (1935): auto-kinetic effect- dot is “moving;” put into groups & develop norm - > humans • placed together seem to develop common standards for behaviour & judgement Conformity & Obedience: • informative social influence: follow opinions/behaviours of others b/c we believe they have accurate knowledge & are doing the right thing Chapter 13: Behaviour in a Social Context 4 • normative social influence: conform to obtain rewards that come from being accepted by other people & avoiding rejection Factors: • - group size: increased 5-35% when confederates increase from 1-5; further=no effect - presence of dissenter: when someone else dissents, this person serves as model for remaining independent from group - > conformity decreases when consequences are more costly & increases when stakes become higher (task is harder) • Milgrim: - remoteness of victim: same room=obedience dropped by 40%; shock plate: 30% - closeness & legitimacy of authority figure: over phone or “ordinary person” dropped by 20% - cog in wheel: obedience increases when someone else has to do dirty work; 93% - personal characteristics: politics, religion, occupation, education= weak difference • by arranging situation appropriately, most people-ordinary, decent citizens- can be induced to follow orders from authority figure they perceive as legitimate, even when doing so contributes to harming innocent people • norm of reciprocity: expectation that when others treat us well, we should respond in kind • door in the face: persuader makes large request, expecting you to reject it, then presents smaller request - > refusing first produces guilt & replying w/ smaller=reduce guilt • foot in door: persuader gets you to comply w/ smaller request & then presents w/ larger request • lowballing: persuader gets you to commit to some action & then before you perform behaviour- increases cost of the same behaviour Crowd Behaviour & Deindividuation: • deindividuation: loss of individuality that leads to disinhibited behaviour - i.e. cheating, stealing, riots by sports fans, genocide • Postmes & Spears: anonymity to outsiders- conditions make individual less identifiable to people outside group reduce feelings of accountability & increase risk of antisocial behaviour Group Influences on Performance & Decision Making: Chapter 13: Behaviour in a Social Context 5 • Alan Ingham: participants exerted 18% less force when thought they were in a group • social loafing: contrast to social facilitation; tendency for people to expend less individual effort when working in group vs working alone • Factors: - people believe that individual performance within group is not being monitored - task has less value/meaning to person - group is less important to person - task is simple & person’s input is redundant w/ that of other group members - fatigue - gender & culture: all-male groups- social loafing=higher vs all-female & mixed-sex groups • social compensation: work harder in group than alone if expect that their colleagues either don’t have enough ability or will slack off • group polarization: when group of like minded people discuss an issue, whether face-to-face or through email, “average” opinion of group members tends to become more extreme - normative social influence: individuals who are attracted to group may be motivated to adapt a more extreme position to gain group’s approval - informational social influence: during group discussions people hear arguments supporting their positions that they had not previously considered • groupthink: tendency for group members to suspend critical thinking b/c they are st
More Less

Related notes for Psychology 1000

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit