Class Notes (836,278)
Canada (509,725)
York University (35,328)
Philosophy (680)
PHIL 2500 (10)
Lecture

Feminist Epistemology & Emotion Jagger.docx

4 Pages
186 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 2500
Professor
Linda Carozza
Semester
Winter

Description
Wednesday March 6 th Feminist Epistemology & Emotion Jagger -Feminist epistemologists contest: Thinking knowledge is universal, objectivity, emotion-western tradition wrongly conceptualizes knowledge focuses on rationality Love and Knowledge-Jagger She focuses on how western tradition overlooks the role emotion when we conceptualize knowledge. Western canon- emotion is regarded with suspicion. Hostile reaction when it comes with validating knowledge attached to emotion. -There’s a separation, can’t be conflated. Western dichotomies: • Reason - Emotion • Rational - Irrational • Mental - Physical • Cultural - Natural • Universal - Particular • Public - Private • Male – Female Left column associated with each other, right side associated with each other. Right side is devalued. -By investigating the emotions those who are oppressed- minority contributes to the development of critical social theory, contests people who a just focus on rationality and positivism. Mixing social investigation/observations with what it means to have objective knowledge. Can’t separate the two. We can’t have knowledge without being conscious of social theory -Less ideological account of knowledge. How we construct knowledge is not just the left side of the binaries, not the only valuable way. Opens it up. Terms-Positivism, empirical testing, bias, “Within the western philosophical tradition emotions have been considered potentially or actually subversive of knowledge. Reason rather than emotion has been regarded as the indispensible faculty for acquiring knowledge.” There is worry that emotion invalidates emotion. Need to separate them. Paranoia that emotions could overthrow rational enterprises, if we allowed emotions into epistemology. Concern that emotion can distort our observations, false concern. -Emotion can help, not hinder or invalidate. -Empirical knowledge: observation and experiences, make them universal. Done in an objective manner, no emotion tainting it. They’re being rational. Your emotions steer you path. It’s supposed to be a political. It’s supposed to be neutral knowledge. She critiques this as absurd, you can’t separate yourself from the quest of knowledge. Biases are the starting point of any scientific study. You make the choice of what you choose to study. Comes from their preferences. Also the choices you make in what you study, who you study, the questions you ask- those come at your discretion. It can’t be completely detached. Biases are the starting point for our studies. Biases are connected to our emotions. Our system of belief- our experiences our intersections of our age, race, education etc. determines what it is we study, how devote our time to that study. -Cannot separate our emotion from our empirical research. -The Myth of the dispassionate investigator- similar to disembodied knowledge. It’s impossible. Oxymoron, inconsistency. Those who have power- that a dispassionate investigator- they have a lack of awareness of emotions. They’re lack of awareness of emotions, they think their doing this neutrally. They don’t think they doing this neutrally, their ignoring their emotions, don’t know emotions are playing a role. -Reason gets associated with dominant groups, gets valued. Stereotypes of women’s emotionality. The myth of the dispassionate investigator upholds, lifts up, and values the epistemic authority of the dominant group. The dominate group gets attached with not being emotional, being dispassionate they get associated with rationality. Uphold the values those who have control, and power. Makes subservient those who are “too emotional” ignore whatever points of view they have. “ . . . rather than repressing emotion in epistemology it is necessary to rethink the relation between knowledge and emotion and construct conceptual models that demonstrate the mutually constitutive rather than oppositional relation between reason and emotion” -Bridge the gap or collapse the dichotomy. Those constructs aren’t separate- reason and emotion. Emotion typically starts the process. Collapses the binary. -Emotions help us observe the world. Emotion effect, shapes and defines our observations. If we both read something we might have different summaries. We’re not objective observers. -• “I wish to begin bridging this gap through the suggestion that emotions may be helpful and even necessary rather than inimical to the construction of knowledge” (p. 153). Problems with theory on emotion- -There are problems in adopting this, emotions aren’t simple. How do we define, describe ant theorize emotion- lots of discrepancy. There are prima
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 2500

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit