Study Guides (248,269)
Canada (121,449)
LAW 603 (58)
Gil Lan (8)

Chapter 14.docx

8 Pages
176 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Law and Business
Course
LAW 603
Professor
Gil Lan
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 14 – Negotiable Instruments Negotiable instruments flow free of the equities and they are governed by special rules that are intended to make the business world operate efficiently. By definition, a negotiable instrument consists of a contract that contains an obligation to pay; it is a contract that is intended to eventually result in the payment of money. Many rules that normally govern contracts do not apply in the same way to negotiable instruments, there are three important differences. Pg. 322** 1. Consideration – the requirement of consideration is more easily satisfied in the case of a cheque. 2. Privity – anyone who holds a cheque can sue on it, even though they were not an original party to the creation of that cheque. 3. Assignment – a person receives a contractual right through an assignment takes it subject to the equities. The assignee cannot be in a better position than the assignor. A negotiable instrument is more valuable that a simple contract because it is negotiable. It can be easily transferred from one party to another in a way that may remove any defects. On the down side it carries the major risk that is associated with every contract: non-performance. If a cheque is created by a person who has no assets, it may be a worthless piece of paper. Coins and bill however are never worthless. Bills of Exchange Act 1890, was created with the intention was to increase economic efficiency by providing business people with a comprehensive set of rules regarding non- monetary payments. It contains a large number of rules that a contract must satisfy. If those requirements are not met, the Act does not apply. If I did not participate in the creation of a cheque I may not be willing to buy it unless I can be assured, by simply looking at that piece of paper, that it is valuable. It applies to only three types of negotiable instruments: cheques, bills of exchange, and promissory notes. A negotiable instrument MUST consist of and contain the following: pg. 324** - It must be signed and written - Parties must be clearly identified - The time of payment must be clearly stated - Must contain an obligation to pay a specific sum of money - Contain unconditional obligation to pay 1. Cheques – the most common form of negotiable instrument. It is created when a person orders a bank to pay a specific amount of money to someone. Parties to a cheque: - Drawer: party who writes the cheques - Drawee: party who is giving the money (bank) - Payee: party who receives the money Most cheques operate smoothly, however some are more complicated and they include: pg. 326** - Postdated cheques: dated after the current date and cannot be cashed until due date - Stale dated cheques: a cheque is stale dated when the payee does not seek payment within a reasonable time. Usually stale after six months. - Overdrawn cheques (“NSF”): drawer’s account does not hold enough funds to satisfy the cheque completely. Cheque may be treated as drawer’s request for loan. However banks usually reject request and refuses payment; bank may accept request, pay, and enforce loan. - Countermanded cheques (“stop payment”): drawer orders bank to refuse payment. Bank must normally obey drawer’s instructions; bank cannot debit drawer’s account, bank will not make payment. The bank may refuse in certain circumstances; eg insufficient details provided on cheque to be countermanded, if honoured by mistake bank usually has right to debit account. - Certified cheques: bank’s promise of payment (guaranteed funds) to payee. Payee has rights against drawer and bank; cheques as good as drawer’s and bank’s promise; payment even if overdrawn and countermanded. Courts generally treat certification as “something equivalent to money.” 2. Bills of Exchange – created when one person orders another person to pay a specific amount of money to a third person. May be drawn on a bank or anyone else. Pg. 329** a. Marissa used a basic pre-formatted bill of exchange. She ordered Red River to pay $100,000 to Olaf six months after March 1 (so September 1). b. Olaf could’ve kept the bill until September 1, but he wanted assurance that he would actually receive payment then. He presented the bill to Red River on March 15. c. Red River could either: i. Indicated it was not prepared to pay $100,000 on September 1, in which case it would’ve dishonoured the bill, and Olaf would’ve been entitled to sue Marissa for immediate payment. ii. Or Red River could’ve indicated that it was willing to honour the bill when it came due. It would’ve have shown acceptance, similar to certification, occurs when the drawee promises to pay a bill. At that point Red River would become to acceptor rather than simply the drawee. d. After acceptance, Red River can be sued by the payee if it fails to make payment on the due date. Adding to that not only was Red River required to pay Olaf $100,000 on September 1, but Marissa also lost the ability to cancel the bill. Note four more important things about bills of exchange: - A bill of exchange is not enforceable unless it is supported to consideration. - A cheque must be payable “on demand”. The drawer must order the drawee to make payment as soon as the payee presents the cheque. If it is payable on demand it is called “demand draft”, if the payee is not entitled to receive any money until three days after the bill has been presented to the drawee then it is called a “sigh draft”, and if it is to be payable only on a future date then it is called a “time draft”. - Also a bill of exchange is usually used for one of two purposes. First, to safely transfer funds. Second, it can be used to easily extend credit. 3. Promissory Notes – is created when one person gives another person a written promise to pay a specific amount of money. The person who creates the instrument is called the “maker” and the person intended to receive the money is once again the “payee”. a. Although there may be no drawee, the bank usually written on the note is where the payment can be received. If not bank is noted then payment may be collected at the maker’s office or home. b. A promissory note is almost always used as accredit instrument. Usually require the payment of interest as well. c. Notes are often payable in instalments. As a matter of risk management a short receipt should be written on the note each time an instalment is paid. Without that the maker may be forced to make the same payment twice. d. An acceleration clause is often found on a promissory note. It states that the entire amount of a promise becomes due immediately if a single instalment is not paid on time. Methods of Negotiation pg. 333** The process of negotiation depends on whether an instrument is payable to bearer or to order. A negotiable instrument is payable to bearer if any person who holds it is entitled to receive payment. Can arise in several ways: - Person X could make the note payable “to person Y or bearer” or “to bearer” - Person X could have left the name of the payee blank - Person X could’ve made the note payable to a fictitious person or to a non-person. A bearer instrument can be negotiated by the simple delivery, or physical transfer, of the document. A negotiable instrument is payable to order if the party that is entitled to receive payment is named. Example being payable “to Person X”. An order instrument cannot be negotiated unless it is endorsed and delivered to a new party. If Person X wanted to negotiate that note to his friend, he could not simply give his friend the cheque, he would also have to endorse it by at least signing his name on the back. Liability – see pg. 334-335 for clarity** The primary liability under a promissory note falls on the maker, however an endorser may also be held liable. A person who provides an endorsement promises people who later acquire the instrument that it will be paid. As a result: - The holder of the note may receive full payment even if the maker was unable to pay a cent. The holder could sue everyone who endorsed the note. If another person simply negotiates/sells the note while
More Less

Related notes for LAW 603

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit