lect 4, 5 Paternalism.docx

3 Pages
100 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHL100Y1
Professor
emmett
Semester
Winter

Description
Physician Paternalism  Differences in opinions of physician and patient cause problems  Who should decide what treatment the patient gets? Physician, patient, or patient’s guardians (in the case where patient is non-autonomous)?  Weak paternalism – directed at someone who is either temporarily or permanently non-autonomous  Strong paternalism – directed at someone who is fully autonomous  very controversial: acceptable or not?  Violates autonomy Justifying Strong Paternalism Different views 1. on grounds of beneficence: benefits of future wellbeing outweigh cost of autonomy 2. on grounds of autonomy: interfering with patient’s autonomy now will greatly enhance their later autonomy (ex: in a case of suicide, others prevent so that they can have autonomy later)  Kantian view – one supreme principle (autonomy), therefore paternalism is hardly ever, or even never justified  Utilitarians – to maximize benefit over cost, then paternalism will be justified John Stuart Mills  Utilitarian 5 premises 1. Restraint is an evil 2. Can’t appeal to the interest of others, so need sufficient justification t 3. Consideration of individual’s own interest  You care a lot more than your wellbeing than I do, if I think I know better, it must be based on generalizations of nature, but sometimes generalizations can be false or misapplied in a certain case  Premise 4 relies heavily on individuals know what is best for them: but it’s questionable how far this goes  Paternalism is usually unjustified  Problem with slavery is that the slaves have denied autonomy Dworkin  Thesis is that paternalism is sometimes justified  Pure paternalism – person whose liberty is being restricted is the same person who benefits from it  Impure paternalism – person whose liberty is being restricted is not the same as the person who benefits from it  preventing harm in others is sometimes sufficient justification for the use of force; no other reasons will be good enough to justify the use of force  Rule out use of force for paternalistic and moralistic (laws that are intended to enhance moral rightness) reasons  Ex: Not justified using force to prevent man marrying a dog  To premise 2, autonomy is intrinsically valuable, therefore intrinsically troubling if being interfered. Autonomy – full free standing member of society, should have ability to make own decisions, if interfered, individual is denied of status in society  In favor of liberty  Mills exception: selling one into slavery  shouldn’t be enforced because once sold into slavery, there will be no more liberty  Problem with slavery is that the slaves have denied autonomy  Does not like the idea that paternalism is justified based on future consent (ex: towards children), because it almost justifies too much, could be potentially dangerous  Difference between evaluative judgements and empirical /descriptive judgement: someone who is not wearing a seatbelt because does not know the risk/someone who wants to wear seatbelt (cognitive mistakes) but forgets vs. someone who is not weighing risk correctly so not wearing it (different value)  disagreement about values  Hard cases of medical paternalism is not because one
More Less

Related notes for PHL100Y1

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit