Study Guides (258,913)
CA (125,050)
UTSG (8,541)
PHL (267)
PHL200Y1 (14)

Aristotle In Class Essay Question Answers

4 Pages
165 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHL200Y1
Professor
Jennifer Whiting

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
PHL200 in-class essay exam on March 3 rd
4 possible questions, be prepared to answer all of them
1.Compare Platos conception of Forms to Aristotles conception of forms, paying special
attention to the question whether Aristotles theory succeeds (as Aristotle seems to think it
does) in avoiding the Third Man Argument.
- Platos theory of Forms asserts that the non-material abstract form (or idea), and not the material
world known to us through sensation, possess the highest and most fundamental kind of reality.
- this was supposed to be Platos possible solution to the problem of universals
- Platos Forms are just that and nothing else (ex. Beautiful)
- Platos theory of forms produces the Third Man Argument:
1. One over many assumption: if there exists a plurality of F things, then there is some one thing,
predicated of all, in virtue of which they are all [called] F
2. Self-predication assumption: what is predicated of a plurality of F things is itself F
3. Non-identity assumption: what is predicated of a plurality of things is always different from that of
which it is predicated
- The third man argument argues against the forms because Platos theory of forms leads to an infinite
regress there becomes an infinite hierarchy of forms with each form partaking in the infinite number
of forms in the hierarchy above it
- Aristotle rejected Platos theory of Forms because he found that referring to what is predicated of all
things as a thisleads to an infinite regress in Platos Theory of Forms
- Aristotles conception of forms involved using primary and secondary substances rather than
Formsbecause all things in existence are substance (whether or not they are material or immaterial)
- Aristotles criticism of Platos theory of Forms was that Plato takes ‘what is predicated of all things
(the Form) to be a thisrather than a such, what is predicated of all things should not be a thisbut
rather a sort of thing
- Aristotle offers a distinction between primary (a thisor particular) and secondary substances (a sort
of thingor universal)
- The primary and secondary substances go hand in hand with one another and cannot exist without
each other (primary substances belong to secondary substances)
- for example: an individual man would be considered a primary substance or a thisand the species
man would be considered a secondary substance or a sort of thing
- things can be predicated of primary substances, but not from
- Aristotle denies self predication of secondary substances
- Primary substances cannot be said of or in anything they are a direct answer to the question ti esti?
(what is it?)
- Aristotle saw that universals were necessary and therefore there is a need for some conception of
Forms
- Science depends on demonstration
DEMONSTRATION: valid logic providing scientific knowledge (why we use the forms)
- For Aristotle: only universals (secondary substances and thus primary substances which belong to
them) are required for demonstration, and NOT Platonic Forms
- Aristotle believes in one thing holding over the many as Plato did with his Theory of Forms, however
Aristotle saw that the some one and the same thing holding over several cases should not have the
same name, as they do in Platos Forms
Is Aristotle right to think that his conception of Forms avoids the Third Man Argument in a way
that Platos conception of Forms does not?
Aristotle is right is thinking that his conception of Forms avoids the Third Man Argument in a way that
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
PHL200 in-class essay exam on March 3 4 possible questions, be prepared to answer all of them 1. Compare Platos conception of Forms to Aristotles conception of forms, paying special attention to the question whether Aristotles theory succeeds (as Aristotle seems to think it does) in avoiding the Third Man Argument. - Platos theory of Forms asserts that the non-material abstract form (or idea), and not the material world known to us through sensation, possess the highest and most fundamental kind of reality. - this was supposed to be Platos possible solution to the problem of universals - Platos Forms are just that and nothing else (ex. Beautiful) - Platos theory of forms produces the Third Man Argument: 1. One over many assumption: if there exists a plurality of F things, then there is some one thing, predicated of all, in virtue of which they are all [called] F 2. Self-predication assumption: what is predicated of a plurality of F things is itself F 3. Non-identity assumption: what is predicated of a plurality of things is always different from that of which it is predicated - The third man argument argues against the forms because Platos theory of forms leads to an infinite regress there becomes an infinite hierarchy of forms with each form partaking in the infinite number of forms in the hierarchy above it - Aristotle rejected Platos theory of Forms because he found that referring to what is predicated of all things as a this leads to an infinite regress in Platos Theory of Forms - Aristotles conception of forms involved using primary and secondary substances rather than Forms because all things in existence are substance (whether or not they are material or immaterial) - Aristotles criticism of Platos theory of Forms was that Plato takes what is predicated of all things (the Form) to be a this rather than a such, what is predicated of all things should not be a this but rather a sort of thing - Aristotle offers a distinction between primary (a this or particular) and secondary substances (a sort of thing or universal) - The primary and secondary substances go hand in hand with one another and cannot exist without each other (primary substances belong to secondary substances) - for example: an individual man would be considered a primary substance or a this and the species man would be considered a secondary substance or a sort of thing - things can be predicated of primary substances, but not from - Aristotle denies self predication of secondary substances - Primary substances cannot be said of or in anything they are a direct answer to the question ti esti? (what is it?) - Aristotle saw that universals were necessary and therefore there is a need for some conception of Forms - Science depends on demonstration DEMONSTRATION: valid logic providing scientific knowledge (why we use the forms) - For Aristotle: only universals (secondary substances and thus primary substances which belong to them) are required for demonstration, and NOT Platonic Forms - Aristotle believes in one thing holding over the many as Plato did with his Theory of Forms, however Aristotle saw that the some one and the same thing holding over several cases should not have the same name, as they do in Platos Forms Is Aristotle right to think that his conception of Forms avoids the Third Man Argument in a way that Platos conception of Forms does not? Aristotle is right is thinking that his conception of Forms avoids the Third Man Argument in a way that www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit