PSYA02H3 Chapter Notes - Chapter 10: Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Louis Leon Thurstone, Fluid And Crystallized Intelligence

29 views10 pages
Published on 14 Apr 2013
School
UTSC
Department
Psychology
Course
PSYA02H3
PSYA02 CHAPTER 10 INTELLIGENCE
- Intelligence is the ability to direct one’s thinking, adapt to one’s circumstances, and learn
from one’s experiences
HOW CAN INTELLIGENCE BE MEASURED:
- Few things are more dangerous than a man with a mission.
- In the 1920s, psychologist Henry Goddard administered intelligence tests to arriving immigrants
at Ellis Island and concluded that the overwhelming majority of Jews, Hungarians, Italians, and
Russians were “feebleminded.”
- intelligence tests have occasionally been used to further detestable ends is especially ironic
because, as we are about to see, such tests were developed for the most noble of purposes: to
help underprivileged children succeed in school.
THE INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT:
- So they set out to develop an objective test that would provide an unbiased measure of a child’s
ability.
- the tasks they tried included solving logic problems, remembering words, copying pictures,
distinguishing edible and inedible foods, making rhymes, and answering questions such as,
“When anyone has offended you and asks you to excuse him, what ought you to do?”
- Binet and Simon designed their test to measure a child’s aptitude for learning independent of
the child’s prior educational achievement, and it was in this sense that they called theirs a test of
“natural intelligence.
- hey suggested that teachers could use their test to estimate a child’s “mental level” simply by
computing the average test score of children in different age groups and then finding the age
group whose average test score was most like that of the child’s.
- For example, a child who was 10 years old but whose score was about the same as the score of
the average 8-year-old was considered to have the mental level of an 8-year-old and thus to
need remedial education.
- German psychologist William Stern (1914) suggested that this mental level could be thought of
as a child’s mental age and that the best way to determine whether a child was developing
normally was to examine the ratio of the child’s mental age to the child’s physical age.
- ratio IQ a statistic obtained by dividing a person’s mental age by the person’s physical age
and then multiplying the quotient by 100
- deviation IQ a statistic obtained by dividing a person’s test score by the average test score of
people in the same age group and then multiplying the quotient by 100.
- The good thing about the deviation IQ is that a 30-year-old cannot become a genius simply by
getting older.
- The bad thing about the deviation IQ is that it does not allow comparisons between people of
different ages.
THE LOGIC OF INTELLIGENCE TESTING:
- Affability, motivation, intact hearing, doting parentsall of these seem likely to influence a
child’s scholastic performance
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
- To design an intelligence test, we begin with the assumption that a property called intelligence
leads people to experience a wide variety of consequences such as getting good grades in
school, becoming a group leader, earning a large income, finding the best route to the gym, or
inventing a greaseless burrito
- would be highly impractical to actually measure these consequences, we instead devise an
easily administered set of tasks (e.g., a geometric puzzle) and questions whose successful
completion is known to be correlated with those consequences.
- intelligence tests do not “measure” intelligence in the same way that thermometers measure
temperature.
- Rather, they measure the ability to answer questions and perform tasks that are highly
correlated with the ability to get good grades, solve real-world problems, and so on.
THE CONSEQUENCES OF INTELLIGENCE:
- intelligence test scores are highly correlated with just about every outcome that human beings
care about.
- Intelligence test scores predict a wide variety of other important consequences from how
likely people are to commit crimes to how long people are likely to live
- Intelligence test scores also predict people’s performance on basic cognitive tasks.
- For instance, when people are briefly exposed to a pair of vertical lines and are asked to
determine which is longer, people with high intelligence test scores require less time to get the
right answer
- Interestingly, intelligence test scores also seem to be fairly good predictors of a person’s political
and religious attitudes:
- The more intelligent people are, the more likely they are to be liberal and atheistic
- intelligence tests scores are excellent predictors of a remarkable range of important
consequences. IQ clearly matters.
SUMMARY:
- Intelligence is a mental ability that enables people to direct their thinking, adapt to their
circumstances, and learn from their experiences.
- Intelligence tests measure responses that are known to be correlated with consequential
behaviors that are thought to be made possible by intelligence.
- Intelligence tests produce a score known as an intelligence quotient or IQ. Ratio IQ is the ratio of
a person’s mental to physical age and deviation IQ is the deviation of a person’s test score from
the average score of his or her peers.
- Intelligence test scores predict a person’s academic performance, job performance, health,
wealth, attitudes, and even basic cognitive abilities.
IS INTELLIGENCE ONE ABILITY OR MANY?:
- Michael Jordan’s brilliance on the basketball court and his mediocrity on the baseball field
proved beyond all doubt that these two sports require different abilities that are not necessarily
possessed by the same individual.
A HEIRARCHY OF ABILITIES:
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
- factor analysis a statistical technique that explains a large number of correlations in terms of
a small number of underlying factors
- If there really is a single, general ability called intelligence that enables people to perform a
variety of intelligent behaviors, then those who have this ability should do well at just about
everything and those who lack it should do well at just about nothing.
- if intelligence is a single, general ability, then there should be a very strong positive correlation
between people’s performances on all kinds of tests.
What did Spearmans research reveal?
- 1) it revealed that most of these measures were indeed positively correlated: Children who
scored high on one measurefor example, distinguishing the musical note C# from Dtended
to score high on the other measuresfor example, solving algebraic equations.
- 2) although different measures were positively correlated, they were not perfectly correlated:
The child who had the very highest score on one measure didn’t necessarily have the very
highest score on every measure.
- Spearman combined these two facts into a two-factor theory of intelligence suggested
that every task requires a combination of a general ability (g) and skills that are specific to the
task (s).
- Louis Thurstone noticed that while scores on most tests were indeed positively correlated,
scores on one kind of verbal test were more highly correlated with scores on another kind of
verbal test than they were with scores on perceptual tests
- Thurstone took this “clustering of correlations” to mean that there was actually no such thing
as g and that there were instead a few stable and independent mental abilities such as
perceptual ability, verbal ability, and numerical ability, which he called the primary mental
abilities
- we have games called baseball and basketball but no game called athletics, so we have abilities
such as verbal ability and perceptual ability but no general ability called intelligence
- confirmatory factor analysis
showed that the correlations between scores on different
mental ability tests are best described by a three-level hierarchy with a general factor (like
Spearman’s g) at the top, specific factors (like Spearman’s s) at the bottom, and a set of factors
called group factors (like Thurstone’s primary mental abilities) in the middle
- This hierarchy suggests that people have a very general ability called intelligence, which is made
up of a small set of middle-level abilities, which are made up of a large set of specific abilities
that are unique to particular tasks.
- Most intelligence test data are best described by a three-level hierarchy with general
intelligence (g) at the top, specific abilities (s) at the bottom, and a small number of middle-level
abilities (m) (sometimes called group factors) in the middle.
THE MIDDLE LEVEL ABILITIES:
- Most psychologists agree that there are very specific mental abilities as well as a very general
mental ability and that one of the important challenges is to describe the middle-level abilities
that lie between them.
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Intelligence is the ability to direct one"s thinking, adapt to one"s circumstances, and learn from one"s experiences. Few things are more dangerous than a man with a mission. In the 1920s, psychologist henry goddard administered intelligence tests to arriving immigrants at ellis island and concluded that the overwhelming majority of jews, hungarians, italians, and. When anyone has offended you and asks you to excuse him, what ought you to do? . Binet and simon designed their test to measure a child"s aptitude for learning independent of the child"s prior educational achievement, and it was in this sense that they called theirs a test of. For example, a child who was 10 years old but whose score was about the same as the score of the average 8-year-old was considered to have the mental level of an 8-year-old and thus to need remedial education.

Get OneClass Grade+

Unlimited access to all notes and study guides.

YearlyMost Popular
75% OFF
$9.98/m
Monthly
$39.98/m
Single doc
$39.98

or

You will be charged $119.76 upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.