Textbook Notes (368,666)
Canada (162,054)
Psychology (9,696)
PSYC12H3 (298)
Chapter 2

Stereotype Threat -Chap2.docx

5 Pages
120 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC12H3
Professor
Michael Inzlicht
Semester
Winter

Description
CHAPTER 2: THE ROLE OF SITUATIONAL CUES IN SIGNALING AND MAINTAINING STEREOTYPE THREAT  Focuses on how stereotype threat is produced and sustained through threatening situational cues in the environment – organization, features & physical characteristics – that suggest the possible mistreatment and devaluation of stigmatized individuals  The meaning people assign to those cues affects whether they will be vulnerable or protected against stereotype threat  The initial aim of stereotype threat research was to examine those factors suppressing the intellectual performance of black students and women in math, science and engineering  Both groups underperformed the SATs  Steele and colleagues = began to investigate whether contending with negative stereotypes, themselves, might be restricting the academic performance of these groups Stereotype Threat: A person in Context  Causes of these groups differences in academic performance –theorizing that the causes might be attributed to features of the situation  When situational cues in a setting make a stereotype salient and relevant to one’s actions, the resulting psychological pressure to disprove the stereotype might depress academic performance  Situational cues can create an atmosphere of identity safety for stigmatized groups, alleviating stereotype threat effects The Role of Cues and Vigilance in Stereotype Threat  Stereotype threat theory begins with the assumption that each person has multiple social identities (e.g. gender, age, race/ethnicity, SES)  When situational cues signal an identity’s value or importance in a setting – that particular group membership becomes more salient than the others and vigilance process is initiated  During vigilance phase of stereotype threat, people’s attention is directed to other situational cues in the environment to determine whether the identity may be a liability 1. If cues in the social environment disconfirm the possibility that one’s social identity will likely to be a source of stigma, devaluation, or mistreatment, vigilance relaxes – performance is congruent to the task at hand 2. If cues confirm the possibility that one’s social identity is likely to be negatively evaluated, vigilance increases  Consequently even seemingly innocuous situational cues – like an instructors race or sex – can be imbued with meaning as ppl try to discern the probability of being devalued in a setting  This research investigated this vigilance process by examining how attention is drawn to relatively innocuous cues in a math, science, and engineering (MSE) environment – which long-standing gender stereotypes abound  In this study: o Male and female MSE majors watched a video advertising a prestigious MSE summer conference, that depicted a gender ration of either 3 men to 1 women or balanced gender ration of 1:1 o Measured participant’s psychological and physiological vigilance as they watched the video o  Women majors who watched the 3:1 video, reported less belonging in the MSE and expressed little desire to attend the conference -- they were more highly vigilant compared to women who watched the gender balance video and men who watched either video o  Women remembered more detail of the conference video, faster heartbeats, sweatier palms, the cue focused women’s attention on their broader social environment o  Women who watched the gender-unbalanced video remembered more MSE-related cues planted in the lab room, including books, journals, posters of Einstein and other groups 1 o THUS situational cues of numeric representation caused these MSE women to engage in vigilance process – deploying attention to situational cues, both within the video and their local environment – to determine the value of their gender identity in the MSE conference setting  Individuals differ with regard to the likelihood and intensity that they engage in the vigilance process o Certain situational cues will be less threatening for people not personally invested in particular domains (e.g. women who avoid MSE) o  The degree to which one identifies with a domain moderates stereotype threat effects  Clear that psychological and behavioral experiences of stereotype threat are grounded in an environment’s situational cues Situational Cues in Academic Settings  Steele and Aronson o The diagnosticity of a test and relevance of a stereotype to people’s test performance – reliably produce stereotype threat among groups whose intellectual abilities are negatively stereotyped o Diagnosticity cue (that test is a valid predictor of their intellectual ability) – clear that one’s intelligence and competence is on the line and will be evaluated o Studies that evoke stereotype relevance either explicitly refer to group stereotypes and more subtly suggest that stereotypes may be relevant to one’s performance  Some studies experimenter inform participants that men are known to outperform women on the impending math test  Research shown that linking one’s identity to one’s performance or future potential subtly suggests diagnosticity and relevance  Some questions can increase the salience of stereotypes related to those group memberships and reduce performances  Highlighting potential for evaluation also intensifies stereotype threat  Studies have show that stereotype relevance does not require heavy-handed experimental manipulations  no additional cue is necessary to induce stereotype threat (e.g. college women take the AP math exam) – show stereotype threat underperformance  All that appears necessary for stereotype threat effects to emerge is = individual aware of the stereotype and aware that the performance task is diagnostic of the ability in question  Research show that the organization of a setting significantly moderates stereotype threat effects  One Experiment: o Manipulated the cue of numeric representation o Women took a math test in a room with two other test-takers – either 2 females, one male and 1 female OR 2 males o  With each man added to the setting, women showed a linear decrease in math performance, whereas men remained unaffected by the cue  Thus the physical arrangements and mere presence of certain groups within a setting are subtle, but powerful, situational cues affecting stigmatized individuals  In fact, people from all social groups – can be affected by identity-threatening cues and experience the cognitive, behavioral and emotional disruptions of stereotype threat o Lationos, negatively stereotyped as intellectually inferior – underperform on math and spatial ability tasks o Low-income students may underperform when their SES background is highlighted o Men’s math performance can become vulnerable when compared to that of Asian American  In a set of studies investigating the effects of the Media (Davies and Colleagues) o Showed women and men three different sets of prime-time TV commercials i. Neutral commercials that advertised products unrelated to gender ii. Gender-stereotypic depictions of women advertisement iii. Counter-stereotypic depicts of women advertisement (e.g. attractive woman impresses a man with her car knowledge) 2  Results  relative to the neutral ads, stereotypic ads activated gender stereotypes and reduced women’s inclinations to occupy leadership roles   Moreover, stereotypic commercials depressed women’s subsequent performance on a non- diagnostic math test, whereas men and women who watched the counterstereotypic commercials performed equally well   Women exposed to the stereotypic commercials even indicated less interest in pursuing quantitative domains as a career, preferring instead to apply their skills to verbal domains in which the potential for gender stereotyping is reduced  Another study – reveals that other people’s behavior can also trigger stereotype threat o Male confederates either did or did not display certain behavioral cues to their female partners – scanning their female conversation partner’s body, showing confident and dominant facial expressions and displaying open body postures o  Found that confederates sexist behaviors were enough to disrupt the performance of even highly skilled female engineering major on a test o Women who interacted with the sexist confederate cognitively suppressed concerns about gender stereotypes in anticipation of their test performance
More Less

Related notes for PSYC12H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit