Class Notes (806,585)
Canada (492,337)
Psychology (3,191)
PSYC 215 (470)

march 6-8.docx

10 Pages
Unlock Document

McGill University
PSYC 215
Michael Sullivan

th PSYC 215 – March 6 , 2012 Social Influence and Persuasion Examples - Marcus in “About a Boy” when says “I love you” to his mom - “A Walk to Remember” – teasing girl who is very conservative. Why Pick on others? - Because we are social organisms, what promotes social cohesion, is everyone doing the same thing. So when people do things we do, we are comfortable with that. When conforming/assimilating we are comfy, if NOT conforming we are not comfortable. So we punish people making us feel uncomfortable. - Too many people different from us? Threatens our group. Premium on being in a group (being social, central to sense of self/coherence/safety), then anything indicating the group is threatened, we react negatively. - Our book says these individuals in these clips have a sense of group which is threatened if too many people act differently. So when someone acts different, we punish them – through ridicule or exclusion. - People ask why do something against the norm. This is a mild, implicit attack. Only do it when people do something different than what we expect. o Ex: why get married? No, don‟t ask why. o Ex: why NOT get married? It‟s weird. o Ex: have kids, won‟t ask why. Don‟t have kids, we ask why. -  ask about non-conformity - Walk down the street, three people look up, you will often look up too! o Why? We behave like the others. People behaviour suggests that they have info we don‟t have – behaving like them can have informative value. - Smoking o Beings in late teens, early adulthood. Smoking behaviour is often influenced by those around us. This puts pressure on us to behave in that way too. - Sex o Socially influenced. When enter this world, we are conforming to perceived norms/expectations on our behaviour. - Sick Building Syndrome o WHO investigate work places making workers sick. “1/3 of buildings have air quality problems.” o Is this an exposure to toxin phenomena? Or a social psychological phenomena? o Almost never able to identify the toxin that could have created these problems (where 600 people go off work) - Mullets - Fashion o About conformity. Those who are trend setters, who we “look up to”, are who we follow. o Once change occurs, we want to conform to what the change is. Research - Psychotherapy, when look at tapes of what went on in psychotherapy session, people show improvement as the degree of emotional and behavioral mimicry increases between client and therapist. When therapist does something, then client does it... they mimic them. This behavioral synchrony, increases progress. Client states they feel better. - Experiment – 2 people waiting in waiting room. Both going into the experiment. One is actually an experimenter B. B rubs face, other person rubs their face too! So if B rubs his face, it‟s more likely that participant rubs his face. If B shakes foot, participant more likely to shake his foot. Traffic lights - Coordinate movement of a lot of vehicles. At a light, we have expectations of others – if green, they will go. If red, they will stop. Need this expectancy, otherwise the situation would be difficult! - “let‟s boycott streetlights!” – there would be a lot of accidents soon. Conforming to rules like this allow us to exist in relative harmony. Behaviour on the road is explicit – clear rules about what to do. - In other areas of life, there are rules which are less explicit. Like gender roles – there are “expectancies”, some different for men. These aren‟t written down somewhere, but they are implicit. - Some situations, there are clear rules for what to do. Clear directive on your behavior, rules you must obey (military) Iraq - Prisoners with bags on heads, then took pictures in embarrassing poses. - Military operation – but most likely no officer said “yeah, let‟s do this!” something else is happening. Something gets them to behave in this way – all the soldiers are conforming. This requires some social involvement – no one does this alone! - Soldiers burning the Qaran – why? Consequence is that is fuels the fire in terms of politics already! Continuum of Social Influence  obedience – compliance – conformity – independence – assertiveness – defiance  - Obedience – someone tells you to do something - Compliance – do gender role - Conformity - Independence – degree to which you don‟t behave like someone else - Assertiveness – make stand to not behave like others - Defiance – go against orders on your behaviour! Classic Studies - Sherif‟s studies on norm formation o Stare at dot, estimate the distance the dot moves. In COMPLETE darkness, people see it move because their head moves, eye moves – they perceive the dot as moving. o First day - Get very varied response. one person says no movement, one says 2 inches, one says 8 inches. o Second day – after shared experience with others, get to see results which are more similar now – conform to other‟s opinions. By end, get consensus that dot moved 2in. o More interact, more we move to a consensus. See this more in ambiguous situations – have no objective reference for what you‟re experiencing. Are most interested in what other people‟s experience are as well. We are looking to others about what this experience is about o See greatest individual variability at beginning, but also see biggest need for info from others - Asch‟s studies on group pressure o Line judgement task o Compare lines to a standard line. Which is the same? It‟s “b” – but what? That‟s not true. o If one person gets it “wrong”, saying B, if enough people agree it‟s B even if you don‟t think it is, you will say it‟s “b” anyways to conform. o Participant denies evidence of his own eyes, and goes with the group. They went along with the group for different reasons – they must be right. They went ahead of me. o Another guy knows he‟s right, but goes along with the group to avoid the discomfort of being opposite the group. Follow incorrect majority.  Why? Discomfort in not behaving like others; some people believed the group was right. o Incorrect majority – 37% follow o 25% refused to go along o 50% conformed on at least 50% of critical trials. Half were willing to go along with majority o Only works if EVERYONE before you gives same wrong answer. If even one person breaks from it before you, then effect is lost – you don‟t go with “majority” - Milgram‟s obedience experiments o Brown-eyed and blue-eyed kids – told “blue” is better. They can‟t play together, brown are not as good. Kids hold up to this because they were told so by their teacher. Conformity - Informational influence o Assumption that others are correct o Sherif‟s experiments - Normative influence o Fear of appearing deviant/different o Asch‟s experiments o Pressure for us to behave in that way – thought of behaving different is anxiety-provoking - Private conformity o Acceptance, conversion o Sherif‟s experiments o Incorporate other information as part of their new experiences o Alter beliefs and believe what they do - Public conformity o Compliance o Asch‟s experiments o Comply to provide a response – know it‟s wrong, but i‟ll say what they say to make situation easier o Alter behaviour to look like others Compliance - Response to direct explicit requests - Can you do me a favour? - Mindlessness – Ellen Langer o May I go ahead of you because I have to make some copies? o Study – people approached while photocopying. Waiting in line. While confederate in line tried to get in front of people, “i‟m in a hurry, can i go ahead?” SURE o “Can i go ahead of you, i have some copies to make” – wth? We all do! o BUT – no difference in compliance in these two! Same percentage of people allowed them to go first. o Mindlessness – prepared to do what others want us to do that we don‟t even process info in request for our behaviour - Norm of Reciprocity o Pressure to comply if we have received something from the individual making the request o See this used by kids wanting dad‟s car. Complement dad first, then ask for something. Get him to reciprocate your complements by giving you the keys – want to “equalize” the imbalance in the relationship. o Giving something to someone creates tension, demanding something back from them to balance the relationship. Do nice things so individual is more likely to agree to your request Foot-in-the-Door - People are more likely to comply with a large request once they have been induced to go along with a smaller initial request. - Freedman and Fraser (1966) o Asked homemakers about their product use. o Three days later ask if men can come and look through their cupboards o Large request only = 22%; small-then-large request = 53% - Self-Percetion Theory o See self as cooperative, agreeable o Maintain self-image – more ready to continue to behave in cooperative/agreeable fashion Low Balling - Securing agreement with a request and then increasing the size of the request o Used car salesperson - Cialdini et al (1978) o Agree to participate in study, then told study begins at 7am o Told first before asked to do study = 31% agree o Told after agreed to do study = 56% agree Door-in-the-Face - Initial large request followed by a smaller request - Cialdini et al (1975) o Request for volunteering for two years o Request to take a group of youth for a 2-hr trip to the zoo o Smaller request only (ask for zoo w/o big request first) = 17% o Large-smaller request (when asked to take kids to the zoo after big request) = 50% That‟s not all – technique - Before response, additional bonus is added - Burger (1986) o Selling cupcakes for 75 cents o Selling cupcakes for 1.00 with 25% discount o 75 cent cupcakes = 44% sales o 25% discount = 73% sales Adveritisng - Biggest example of large scale persuasion. - Political campaign – also a big influence for persuasion to change your behaviour - Effective elements of a Persuasion Campaign o Get people‟s attention!  Enhance how? Change style of delivery – message was too long! Make it easier to capture idea.  Who are the other people? Why should I care about them? o Appearance! Convey professionalism of a representative. o Lots of info to communicate? Maybe provide another resource to go see the issues she is mentioning (website? Pamphlet?) o Associate person with something that sticks. That is what we do as humans – remember things associated with something else. Present one thing, brings other thing to mind. o What does your position do? Explain what your position is for. o Saying “Yeah free beer!” doesn‟t - MARLBORO Cigarette Advertisement o Man on horse, holding rope. Why does this work? When see Marlboro cigarette, you imagine yourself on the horse! Yes! I‟ll be a cowboy!! o People smoking outside a door together, cigarettes in a casket... Getting people to STOP smoking. Associate smokin
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 215

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.