EDUC 220 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Differentiated Instruction, Statistical Significance, Participant Observation

19 views2 pages

rosefox464

9 Jun 2020

School

Simon Fraser University

Department

Education

Course

EDUC 220

Professor

John Nesbit

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Reflection is the process of thinking about a situation or event and thinking about how you are responding to it, involves reasoning about the causes of events, and about your own feeling and thoughts. A reflective teacher is one who thinks through what happened in the classroom to understand it better. A reflective studen t monitors their understanding and the emotions that affect their learning. Differentiated instruction is adapted to students" abilities, knowledge or interests - i offers learning activities that match students" needs. Descriptive studies research that observes and does not intervene is called descriptive research or descriptive studies. Data collected in descriptive studies can be qualitative or quantitative interviews, questionnaires, video recordings of behavior, notes recording help-seeking behavior, etc. A case study is descriptive research that examines a single event, institution, group or person in detail. Experimental research, or experimentation, manipulates independent variables and observes their effects on dependent variables.

Related Questions

This is not plagiarism

Item 6

Original Source Material

Student Version

The philosophical position known as constructivism viewsknowledge as a human construction. The various perspectives withinconstructivism are based on the premise that knowledge is not partof an objective, external reality that is separate from theindividual. Instead, human knowledge, whether the bodies of contentin public disciplines (such as mathematics or sociology) orknowledge of the individual learner, is a human construction.

References:
Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory intopractice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Does knowledge exist outside of, or separate from, theindividual who knows? Constructivists hold that human knowledge,whether the bodies of content in public disciplines (such asmathematics or sociology) or knowledge of the individual learner,is a human construction (Gredler, 2001).

References:
Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory intopractice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Which of the following is true for the Student Versionabove?

Word-for-Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

Item 7

Original Source Material

Student Version (written in 2002)

The technological tools available today for creatingcomputer-based learning materials are incredibly more powerful thanthose introduced just a few years ago. We can make our own movieswith camcorders in our homes; we can publish our own books. Soonteachers and students will be able to use computer-video technologyto produce their own learning materials. All it takes is time,know-how, and some funds.

References:
Frick, T. (1991). Restructuring education throughtechnology. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa EducationalFoundation.

Frick (1991) suggested that teachers and students would becapable of using computer-video technology to make learningresources. Furthermore, Frick's observation regarding tools forcreating learning materials that leverage computers that are a lotmore powerful than technology used just a few years back remainstrue over a decade later.

References:
Frick, T. (1991). Restructuring education throughtechnology. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa EducationalFoundation.

Which of the following is true for the Student Versionabove?

Word-for-Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

Item 8

Original Source Material

Student Version

No matter how kindly voters treat the panderer in the votingbooth, the public overwhelmingly believes that candidates will sayone thing to get elected and then ignore their pledges once inoffice. This lack of sincerity, to the extent that happens, reducespublic confidence in government. Candidates should say what theybelieve. At the same time, the public should demand that candidatesspeak frankly and truthfully about issues of concern, and it mustunderstand that once a person is elected and looks at the fact inmuch greater detail, changes in attitude do and should occur.

References:
Simon, P. (2003). Our culture of pandering.Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University Press.

The relationship between voters and candidates is a complicatedone. For example, the vast majority of the public is convinced thatcandidates will promise anything to be elected and then pay noattention to their promises once elected (Simon, 2003). Such astate of affairs sets low expectations for those running foroffice.

Which of the following is true for the Student Versionabove?

Word-for-Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

Item 9

In the case below, the original source material is given alongwith a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism byclicking the appropriate radio button.

Original Source Material

Student Version

Overall findings revealed that the technology skills ofpreservice teachers participating in this study were relativelylow, while providing a basis upon which to identify prerequisiteskills and instructional objectives for teaching technology skillsand integration practices. In planning experiences fortechnology-rich teacher education programs, curriculum designerscould consider some skills as prerequisite, such as wordprocessing, basic computer operation skills, e-mail, and skillsassociated with the World Wide Web.

Reference 1
Brush, T., Glazewski, K. D., & Hew, K. F. (2008). Developmentof an instrument to measure preservice teachers' technology skills,technology beliefs, and technology barriers. Computers in theSchools, 25(1), 112-125.

Original Source Material 2
With regard to factors that contribute to the teachersâ readiness,computer proficiency took priority. Basically, if teacher computerproficiency increases, the teachersâ feeling to be more ready tointegrate technology into instruction alsoincreases.

Reference 2
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affectingtechnology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model.Educational Technology Research and Development,58(2), 137-154.

Low computer proficiency may negatively affect the use oftechnology in schools (Inan & Lowther, 2010) To addresspotentially low technology skills among preservice teachers,teacher educators could consider some skills as prerequisite, suchas word processing, basic computer operation skills, e-mail, andskills associated with the World Wide Web. However, this approachwould require instructional options for students who lack suchskills.

Which of the following is true for the Student Versionabove?

Word-for-Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

Item 10

Original Source Material

Student Version

Educational processes and systems are complex, and any attemptto measure them, especially at this level of aggregation, can onlylead to broad and general discussions. However, we contend thatthis discussion is necessary. Further, attempting to measure globalprocesses in education may provide another puzzle piece totheoreticians as well as national and local policy-makers, who areworking at understanding and, in the latter case, steeringeducational systems.

References:
Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2009). Trends in TIMSSresponses over time: Evidence of global forces in education?Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(2), 137-152.

In attempting to study and direct the future of complexeducational systems, theoreticians and policy-makers may findaggregated measures of global processes in education useful despitelimitations that may be associated with these measures (Rutkowski& Rutkowski, 2009).

References:
Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2009). Trends in TIMSSresponses over time: Evidence of global forces in education?Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(2), 137-152.

Which of the following is true for the Student Versionabove?

Word-for-Word plagiarism

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

pucehamster827

For many of us, smartphones have become indispensable, but they have also come under fire
for their impact on the way we think and behave, especially among children. Two of the largest
investors in Apple Inc. are urging the iPhone maker to take action against smartphone addiction
among children over growing concerns about the negative effects of technology. An open letter
to Apple on January 6, 2018 from New York-based JANA Partners and the California State
Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) stated that the firm must do more to help children
fight smartphone addiction. These two shareholders together control about $2 billion in Apple
stock. The investors’ letter urged Apple to offer tools to prevent smartphone addiction and to
provide more parental options for monitoring children’s smartphone usage. The iOS operating
system for Apple smartphones and tablets already has limited parental controls for restricting
Examiners: Dr. Emmanuel Awuni and Dr. Acheampong Owusu Page 2 of 4
apps, features such as location sharing, and access to certain types of content. The investors
felt Apple needs to do more—for example, enable parents to specify the age of the user of the
phone during setup, establish limits on screen time, select hours of the day the phone can be
used, and block social media services.
The average American teenager who uses a smartphone receives his or her first phone at age
10 and spends over 4.5 hours a day on it (excluding texting and talking). Seventy-eight percent
of teens check their phones at least hourly and 50 percent report feeling “addicted” to their
phones. The investors’ letter cited a number of studies on the negative effects of heavy
smartphone and social media use on the mental and physical health of children whose brains
are still developing. These range from distractions in the classroom to a higher risk of suicide
and depression. A recent survey of over 2,300 teachers by them Center on Media and Child
Health and the University of Alberta found that 67 percent of the teachers reported that the
number of students who are negatively distracted by digital technologies in the classroom is
growing. Seventy-five percent of these teachers think students’ ability to focus on educational
tasks has decreased. Research by psychology professor Jean Twenge of San Diego State
University found that U.S. teenagers who spend 3 hours a day or more on electronic devices
are 35 percent more likely, and those who spend 5 hours, or more are 71 percent more likely,
to have a risk factor for suicide than those who spend less than 1 hour. This research also
showed that eighth-graders who are heavy users of social media have a 27 percent higher risk
of depression. Those who spend more than the average time playing sports, hanging out with
friends in person, or doing homework have a significantly lower risk. Additionally, teens who
spend 5 or more hours a day on electronic devices are 51 percent more likely to get less than 7
hours of sleep per night (versus the recommended 9).
Nicholas Carr, who has studied the impact of technology on business and culture, shares these
concerns. He has been highly critical of the Internet’s effect on cognition, and these cognitive
effects extend to smartphone use. Carr worries that excessive use of mobile devices diminishes
the capacity for concentration and contemplation. Carr recognizes that smartphones provide
many useful functions in a very handy form. However, this extraordinary usefulness gives them
too much influence on our attention, thinking, and behaviour. Smartphones shape our thoughts
in deep and complicated ways, and their effects persist even when we aren’t using the devices.
Research suggests that the intellect weakens as the brain grows dependent on the technology.
Carr points to the work of Adrian Ward, a cognitive psychologist and marketing professor at
the University of Texas at Austin, who for a decade has been studying how smartphones and
the Internet affect people’s thoughts and judgment. Ward has observed that using a smartphone,
or even hearing one ring or vibrate, produces distractions that make it harder to concentrate on
a difficult problem or job. Divided attention impedes reasoning and performance.
A study published in Applied Cognitive Psychology in April 2017 examined how smartphones
affected learning in a lecture class with 160 students at the University of Arkansas at
Monticello. It found that students who didn’t bring their phones to the classroom scored a full
letter-grade higher on a test of the material presented than those who brought their phones. It
didn’t matter whether students who brought their phones used them or not. A study of 91 U.K.
secondary schools, published in 2016 in the journal Labour Economics, found that when
schools ban smartphones, students’ examination scores go up substantially, and the weakest
students benefit the most. Carr also observes that using smartphones extensively can be
detrimental to social skills and relationships. Connecting with “friends” electronically via
smartphones is not a substitute for genuine person-to-person relationships and face-to-face
conversations.

rubyarmadillo521

EDUC 220 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Differentiated Instruction, Statistical Significance, Participant Observation

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

EDUC 220 Chapter Notes - Chapter 1: The World Of Lily Wong, Educational Psychology, Participant Observation

EDUC 220 Chapter Notes - Chapter 14: Differentiated Instruction, Direct Instruction, Railways Act 1921

EDUC 220 Chapter Notes - Chapter 14: Direct Instruction, Behavior Management, Railways Act 1921

Related Questions