Textbook Notes (368,721)
Canada (162,106)
POLI 212 (46)
Chapter 12

POLI 212 Chapter 12: Nationalism and Ethnicity
Premium

8 Pages
12 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 212
Professor
Anthony Imbrogno
Semester
Winter

Description
Nationalism  Nation: group of people who believe they are ancestrally related, share customs, norms, and language  Nationalism: identification and loyalty to one’s nation expressed politically to support sense of belongingness  Under feudalism: no nations, no states o Instead, complex web of alliances and loyalty  Bitter conflicts over religion led to Peace of Westphalia  State: legitimate use of force and collection of taxes (sovereignty) within defined borders assigned to a single ruler/government  Nation-state: one nation controls state apparatus; nation that corresponds to a country o A nation does not have to correspond to a country  E.g. Scots nation in UK o Nation can stretch across two countries  E.g. Basques across Spain and France  When a nation is not a nation-state, it is an ethnic group  Nation and ethnic groups as sources of identity  Roma = ethnic group with most hapless plight in Europe o Along with Jews, suffered most in Holocaust and still discriminated against today o Some people wrongly think Roma are nomads o France deported more than 10,000 Roma in 2009  Nicolas Sarkozy is most hostile European statesman toward the Roma  Sarkozy deported Roma – gave them 300 euros of “humanitarian reparation” and sent them back to Eastern Europe  Many observers called the deportations “ethnic cleansing”  Strong national and ethnic identities may not be harmful  considered a good thing because it gives a feeling of belongingness to people  Negative consequences of strong national identities may lead to political instability and even violence  Increased migration within and outside Europe has made the ethnic composition of European countries more complex Yugoslavia  Yugoslavia became communist after WWII but kept distance from Soviet Union  Violence broke out in Yugoslavia in 1991  Communist leaders (such as Seb Slobudan Milosevic and Croat Franju Tudjman) turned into fierce nationalists o People suddenly ready to die for ethnicity/nationality  Initially/historically all South Slavs belonged to same ethnic groups o Common origin explains why it’s difficult to distinguish members of the current ethnic groups by their physical appearance  Croats and Slovenes became Roman Catholic  mostly to the west, of Yugoslavia closest to Rome  Serbs and Macedonians became Christian Orthodox  mostly in west of Yugoslavia, under influence of Russian Christian Orthodox Church  Muslims in Yugoslavia were originally Christians living in the central region of Bosnia- Herzegovina o Practiced a controversial kind of Christianity considered heresy by other Christian churches o Manichaens; sometimes called Bosniaks o Sought protection of Ottoman Empire because not backed by a powerful outside religious center  converted to Islam voluntarily or by force  Albanians – ethnically not South Slavs o Dominant group in Kosovo; Serbs are minority in Kosovo  Different ethnic groups has greatly contributed to problems in Kosovo  Cruelty between Muslims and Serbs living together in Bosnia but also friendships across ethnic lines o When Communism was lifted from Bosnia-Herzegovina, old hatreds emerged  19 century – Ottoman Empire began to decay  allowed Serbs to form own kingdom of Serbia and Montenegrins to form own kingdom of Montenegro  Versailles Peace Conference created a very artificial entity called the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes o King was a Serb who established authoritarian regime  Renamed Kingdom of Yugoslavia (1929) o Didn’t consult the people  Other ethnic groups resented dominance of the Serbs o 1934 – a Croat assassinated the king  WWII – power relations changed between Croats and Serbs o Croatia became a puppet regime of Hitler and committed many atrocities against the Serbs  After WWII, Marshal Tito established a communist regime o Believed ethnicity had no place in communism  Organized the country in a way so that political lines didn’t follow ethnic lines  Language did contribute to ethnic divisions o Slovenes and Croats used the Roman alphabet o Other ethnic groups used the Cyrillic script o How people wrote gave a clear indication as to what ethnic group they belonged to  Huge economic inequalities among the ethnic groups o Slovenia had a per capita income 7x higher than in Kosovo and 3x higher than in Macedonia and Montenegro  After 1990 – Slovenia and Croatia attempted to become independent countries o Territorial integrity and self-determination in conflict with each other  Territorial integrity = international borders can be changed only by peaceful means and by common agreement  Self-determination = all people who so desire have the right to a sovereign and independent state o International community originally gave preference to territorial integrity  September 27, 1990 – Slovenian parliament decided that Yugoslavia federal law would no longer apply within borders of Slovenia o December 1990 – 89% of Slovenian voters approved independence in a popular referendum  May 1991 – 93% of Croatian voters approved appendence for Croatia in a popular referendum  June 1991 – Yugoslav PM warned Slovenia and Croatia that the Federal Government would use all means to stop their unilateral steps toward independence o Slovenia and Croatia formally declare independence the day after warning is issued  3 days after warning – armed hostilities broke out between the Yugoslav Federal Army and the Slovenian Militia o Hostilities spread to Croatia by early August  Germany pushed for international recognition of Slovenian and Croatian independence o Strong domestic pressure to give Slovenia and Croatia right of self-determination o Linked the issue to the recent German unification o All parties supported self-determination for Yugoslavia crisis o Germany used its strength to impose its will and get other Western Countries (USA, UK, France) to support right of self-determination for Slovenia and Croatia  January 1992 – EU recognizes Slovenia and Croatia as sovereign, independent states o UN recognizes Slovenia and Croatia in May 1992  Slovenia – hostilities were never severe and came to a quick end o Slovenia had advantage of being the most homogenous of the Yugoslav republics  90% Slovenes o Most Westernized and economically most developed o Only former Yugoslav republic to reach some degree of political and economic stability relatively quickly o Joined EU in 2004 – first region of former Yugoslavia to do so  Joined EU currency in 2007  Croatia – substantial minority of Serbs who were concentrated in the region of Krajina (south-center of Croatia) o In old Yugoslavia Krajina Serbs lived with Serbs of Serbian republic within the national borders of Croatia  Serbia has now become a foreign country to them  Situation not accepted by Krajina Serbs  Resistance supported by the Serbian leaders in Belgrade who still controlled the Yugoslav Federal Army  fighting erupted, Yugoslav federal army even attacked Croatian presidential palace in Zagreb o International media made Serbs seem like the aggressor  Croatian-Serbian war – War of Independence vs War of Secession o Perspective of American War of Independence – Croats have all rights on their side  Just as American colonies liberated selves from British domination, Croats liberated selves from Serb domination o Perspective of American War of Secession – US south tried to leave Union, President Lincoln used federal forces to stop them  Not wrong for Yugoslavia to use federal forces to stop Croatia from leaving  Krajina Serbs – did they have a right to self-determination? o They believed so  wished to be independent or join Serbia o Krajina had no common border with Serbia, but could’ve joined Serbia as a Croat enclave o Croatia severely restricted the rights of Krajina Serbs  E.g. replace Serbian road signs in their villages with Croatian signs o Croatian president Franjo Tudjman promised the EU that the Krajina Serbs would be given “special status”  enough for EU to not get involved in issue o Krajina Serbs were considered a minority with the right to autonomy but not to independence o Croatia was considered a territorially defined administrative unit and was entitled to independence  Krajina Serbs were relatively in a well-defined area, why couldn’t they claim this?  Krajina Serbs attempted this by forming the Serbian Republic of Krajina but neither Croatia nor the international community recognized this entity o Krajina region became more and more isolated and economically devastated o June 1993 – Krajina Serbs organizes a referendum where they decided overwhelmi
More Less

Related notes for POLI 212

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit